User talk:Sophiedookh

Welcome!
Hello, Sophiedookh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:


 * Crystal Clear app ksmiletris.png  Introduction
 * 5     The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Crystal package utilities.png  How to edit a page
 * Crystal khelpcenter.png  Help
 * Crystal Clear app ktip.png  Tips
 * Crystal Clear app ksokoban.png  How to write a great article
 * Crystal Clear app kedit.png  Manual of Style
 * Nuvola apps konquest.png  Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! • Gene93k (talk) 23:15, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:LIZ-N-VAL-Sinsational.jpeg


A tag has been placed on File:LIZ-N-VAL-Sinsational.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 09:50, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:LIZ-N-VAL Portable Museum Apple Sale in 1985.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:LIZ-N-VAL Portable Museum Apple Sale in 1985.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:LIZ-N-VAL Portable Museum in Venice1985.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:LIZ-N-VAL Portable Museum in Venice1985.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Liz-N-Val, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 22:23, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Non-free rationale for File:LIZ-N-VAL Portable Museum Apple Sale in 1985.jpeg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:LIZ-N-VAL Portable Museum Apple Sale in 1985.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:15, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:LIZ-N-VAL-Spielberg Head.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:LIZ-N-VAL-Spielberg Head.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:30, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:LIZ-N-VAL-Walking Woof.tiff
Thanks for uploading File:LIZ-N-VAL-Walking Woof.tiff. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:54, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Files missing description details
Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as: are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
 * File:LIZ-N-VAL-Walking Woof.tiff
 * File:LIZ-N-VAL-Woman wanted for Rape.jpeg

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:22, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:LIZ-N-VAL-Woman wanted for Rape.jpeg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LIZ-N-VAL-Woman wanted for Rape.jpeg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 13:27, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

File source problem with File:LIZ-N-VAL-Woman wanted for Rape.jpeg
Thank you for uploading File:LIZ-N-VAL-Woman wanted for Rape.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 07:36, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Irene Caesar, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Constructivism and BCI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Irene Caesar, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Capitol and Samara. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard, you may be blocked from editing. Arxiloxos (talk) 19:41, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:24, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Maintenance tags
Please don't unilaterally remove the maintenance templates from Irene Caesar. It's apparent that other editors perceive continuing issues with this article, so these tags should remain until there is a consensus that they are no longer needed. Thank you.--Arxiloxos (talk) 14:58, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Scaleshombre conducts a defamation vendetta on Irene Caesar and her views on history. According to Wikipedia criteria, this article definitely passes the criteria of noticeability. PLEASE PUT A BLOCK ON SCALESHOMBRE ATTACKS AND DEFAMATION AND ABUSE CAMPAIGN! Here are the Reasons for deletion in the Wikipedia policy:

Copyright violations and other material violating Wikipedia's non-free content criteria -- ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIA Vandalism, including inflammatory redirects, pages that exist only to disparage their subject, patent nonsense, or gibberish -- ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIA

Advertising or other spam without relevant content (but not an article about an advertising-related subject) -- ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIA

Content forks (unless a merger or redirect is appropriate) -- ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIA

Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms, original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes) -- ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIA. THERE ARE LOADS OF RELIABLE NOTICEABLE SOURCES ON THE LEVEL OF THE STATE TV STATIONS, AND MAJOR NEWSPAPERS

Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed - ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIA. THERE ARE LOADS OF RELIABLE NOTICEABLE SOURCES ON THE LEVEL OF THE STATE TV STATIONS, AND MAJOR NEWSPAPERS

Articles whose subjects fail to meet the relevant notability guideline (WP:N, WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC, WP:CORP and so forth) -- ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIA. THERE ARE LOADS OF RELIABLE NOTICEABLE SOURCES ON THE LEVEL OF THE STATE TV STATIONS, AND MAJOR NEWSPAPERSv

Articles that breach Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons - ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIAv

Redundant or otherwise useless templates - ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIA. THERE ARE LOADS OF RELIABLE NOTICEABLE SOURCES ON THE LEVEL OF THE STATE TV STATIONS, AND MAJOR NEWSPAPERS

Categories representing overcategorization - ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIA. THERE ARE LOADS OF RELIABLE NOTICEABLE SOURCES ON THE LEVEL OF THE STATE TV STATIONS, AND MAJOR NEWSPAPERS

Files that are unused, obsolete, or violate the Non-free policy - ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIA. THERE ARE LOADS OF RELIABLE NOTICEABLE SOURCES ON THE LEVEL OF THE STATE TV STATIONS, AND MAJOR NEWSPAPERS

Any other use of the article, template, project, or user namespace that is contrary to the established separate policy for that namespace - ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIA. THERE ARE LOADS OF RELIABLE NOTICEABLE SOURCES ON THE LEVEL OF THE STATE TV STATIONS, AND MAJOR NEWSPAPERS

Any other content not suitable for an encyclopaedia -- ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIA. THERE ARE LOADS OF RELIABLE NOTICEABLE SOURCES ON THE LEVEL OF THE STATE TV STATIONS, AND MAJOR NEWSPAPERS

October 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this recent edit to Irene Caesar, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Tutelary (talk) 19:13, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with this edit to Irene Caesar. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Tutelary (talk) 19:20, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to Irene Caesar. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. --Richard Yin (talk) 19:21, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Scaleshombre conducts a defamation vendetta on Irene Caesar and her views on history. According to Wikipedia criteria, this article definitely passes the criteria of noticeability. PLEASE PUT A BLOCK ON SCALESHOMBRE ATTACKS AND DEFAMATION AND ABUSE CAMPAIGN! Here are the Reasons for deletion in the Wikipedia policy:

Copyright violations and other material violating Wikipedia's non-free content criteria -- ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIA Vandalism, including inflammatory redirects, pages that exist only to disparage their subject, patent nonsense, or gibberish -- ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIA

Advertising or other spam without relevant content (but not an article about an advertising-related subject) -- ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIA

Content forks (unless a merger or redirect is appropriate) -- ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIA

Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms, original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes) -- ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIA. THERE ARE LOADS OF RELIABLE NOTICEABLE SOURCES ON THE LEVEL OF THE STATE TV STATIONS, AND MAJOR NEWSPAPERS

Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed - ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIA. THERE ARE LOADS OF RELIABLE NOTICEABLE SOURCES ON THE LEVEL OF THE STATE TV STATIONS, AND MAJOR NEWSPAPERS

Articles whose subjects fail to meet the relevant notability guideline (WP:N, WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC, WP:CORP and so forth) -- ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIA. THERE ARE LOADS OF RELIABLE NOTICEABLE SOURCES ON THE LEVEL OF THE STATE TV STATIONS, AND MAJOR NEWSPAPERSv

Articles that breach Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons - ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIAv

Redundant or otherwise useless templates - ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIA. THERE ARE LOADS OF RELIABLE NOTICEABLE SOURCES ON THE LEVEL OF THE STATE TV STATIONS, AND MAJOR NEWSPAPERS

Categories representing overcategorization - ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIA. THERE ARE LOADS OF RELIABLE NOTICEABLE SOURCES ON THE LEVEL OF THE STATE TV STATIONS, AND MAJOR NEWSPAPERS

Files that are unused, obsolete, or violate the Non-free policy - ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIA. THERE ARE LOADS OF RELIABLE NOTICEABLE SOURCES ON THE LEVEL OF THE STATE TV STATIONS, AND MAJOR NEWSPAPERS

Any other use of the article, template, project, or user namespace that is contrary to the established separate policy for that namespace - ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIA. THERE ARE LOADS OF RELIABLE NOTICEABLE SOURCES ON THE LEVEL OF THE STATE TV STATIONS, AND MAJOR NEWSPAPERS

Any other content not suitable for an encyclopaedia -- ARTICLE ON IRENE CAESAR DOES NOT VIOLATE THIS CRITERIA. THERE ARE LOADS OF RELIABLE NOTICEABLE SOURCES ON THE LEVEL OF THE STATE TV STATIONS, AND MAJOR NEWSPAPERS --sophiedookh (User Talk:sophiedookh) 19:21, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Irene Caesar
I'll copy my response to your comments here, because it seems you didn't see them at the Articles for Deletion page.

While I know how angering/stressful it can be to see your hard work nominated for deletion, some things to keep in mind:
 * Only the reason for deletion need be addressed, not all reasons for deletion. Please check WP:N for more information about this one -- "notability" is kind of a technical term on Wikipedia.
 * Please link to policies rather than copy/paste -- and you can usually take for granted people participating know (or should know) the reasons for deletion. Use of CAPS is also generally unsightly and distracting. A final stylistic note: html tags are typically not needed -- and can create problems -- so no need for . You might want to poke around Wikipedia:Help.
 * Focus on the article and the reason for deletion, not the person nominating it. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is assume good faith. To say the nominator is on a "defamation campaign" is completely inappropriate here. "Defamation" is, furthermore, a serious allegation with potential legal implications. If you feel a user is acting in bad faith or working to malign/smear someone in their Wikipedia article, this is not the place to do so. Instead, look here: WP:BLPN. If you have other questions about how this works, you can leave a message on my talk page. --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 07:09, 6 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Rhododendrites Dear Rhododendrites,

I have created a couple articles on artists, including the article on Irene Caesar. Recently, the article became a subject to vandalism by a user Scaleshombre. If you trace the history of edits, you will see that he tried to insert abusive and mistaken information into the article, and, finally, filed for deletion based upon the unjustifiable claim. The article was vandalised, the improper information was inserted, the important data was deleted, and then unjustified claims were made based upon improper additions and delitions.

The Notability of this article is supported by the references to the important art journals and monographs on art, like "Dialogue of Arts", the official art journal of the Museum of Modern Art, the Journal on Biblical Studies of the University of the South, South Africa, etc. with articles on Irene Caesar, written by Prof. Arthur Danto of the Columbia University, the most important Anglo-American art critic and philosopher, by Prof. Pilar Viviente for the "Sapiens" Journal of the University of Miguel Hernandez in Spain, and like the monograph on art by Prof. Tiziana Andina from the University of Turin. Caesar was also published in the New Yorker, and this should be inserted into the article.

There were no multiple accounts. Please unblock me.

Best,

Sophiedookh sophiedookh ☥   17:10, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Blocked
I've blocked you for 24 hours for disruptive editing. This is unacceptable; calling other editors liars and top/double posting. Dreadstar ☥   00:32, 7 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Dreadstar But I can prove that what that person said is not true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sophiedookh (talk • contribs)
 * Still no reason to attack another editor by calling them a liar. This is the second personal attack you've made, and you've been editing in a disruptive fashion.  Dreadstar  ☥   01:16, 7 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I've extended your block to 90 days because you evaded your block by Sockpuppetry. Dreadstar  ☥   16:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Dreadstar There was no multiple accounts, and I can prove it. Please unblock me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sophiedookh (talk • contribs)
 * Dreadstar Dear Dreadstar,

I have created a couple articles on artists, including the article on Irene Caesar. Recently, the article became a subject to vandalism by a user Scaleshombre. If you trace the history of edits, you will see that he tried to insert abusive and mistaken information into the article, and, finally, filed for deletion based upon the unjustifiable claim. The article was vandalised, the improper information was inserted, the important data was deleted, and then unjustified claims were made based upon improper additions and delitions.

The Notability of this article is supported by the references to the important art journals and monographs on art, like "Dialogue of Arts", the official art journal of the Museum of Modern Art, the Journal on Biblical Studies of the University of the South, South Africa, etc. with articles on Irene Caesar, written by Prof. Arthur Danto of the Columbia University, the most important Anglo-American art critic and philosopher, by Prof. Pilar Viviente for the "Sapiens" Journal of the University of Miguel Hernandez in Spain, and like the monograph on art by Prof. Tiziana Andina from the University of Turin. Caesar was also published in the New Yorker, and this should be inserted into the article.

There were no multiple accounts. Please unblock me.

Best,

Sophiedookh sophiedookh ☥   17:10, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet Comments
As a courtesy, I'm informing you that I've removed comments you posted under your sockpuppet on Afd page. Scaleshombre (talk) 03:37, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed| reason=there were no multiple accounts, and I can prove it. There were no disruptive editing. Please stop vandalism by Scaleshombre}|decline= I would be interested in how you can prove that you didn't use multiple accounts. I ran a checkuser, and it the technical connection was, which combined with the behavioral evidence strongly suggests that you have used multiple accounts. In this context, I'm declining your request to be unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 07:48, 8 October 2014 (UTC)}}

I have created a couple articles on artists, including the article on Irene Caesar. Recently, the article became a subject to vandalism by a user Scaleshombre. If you trace the history of edits, you will see that he tried to insert abusive and mistaken information into the article, and, finally, filed for deletion based upon the unjustifiable claim. The article was vandalised, the improper information was inserted, the important data was deleted, and then unjustified claims were made based upon improper additions and delitions. The Notability of this article is supported by the references to the important art journals and monographs on art, like "Dialogue of Arts", the official art journal of the Museum of Modern Art, the Journal on Biblical Studies of the University of the South, South Africa, etc. with articles on Irene Caesar, written by Prof. Arthur Danto of the Columbia University, the most important Anglo-American art critic and philosopher, by Prof. Pilar Viviente for the "Sapiens" Journal of the University of Miguel Hernandez in Spain, and like the monograph on art by Prof. Tiziana Andina from the University of Turin. Caesar was also published in the New Yorker, and this should be inserted into the article. There were no multiple accounts. Please unblock me. Best, Sophiedookh sophiedookh ☥ 17:10, 7 October 2014 (UTC)