User talk:Sophiefaina

Speedy deletion of "Camp Louise"
A page you created, Camp Louise, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. JaGa (talk) 03:20, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Camp Louise
A tag has been placed on Camp Louise requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. NuclearWarfare (talk) 04:22, 19 July 2008 (UTC)


 * since it seems that it might be a historic camp, and one known for its social role, As reviewing administrator, I consider the article might show some importance and I declined to delete it. However, you will have to show this with 3rd party independent reliable published sources, print or online (but not blogs or press releases). a locvcal librarian should be able to help, because local newspapers will be the most likely source. DGG (talk) 13:16, 19 July 2008 (UTC)