User talk:Sophieschindler/sandbox

First entry has a nice neutral, reliable source that provides you great information to place in your entry. You do a nice job at bringing the entire source into a nice paragraph to cover all bases that the source covers. The information you provide is neutral in the fact that you explicitly state what sports medicine and specialists do for sports. One area that could be tweaked is your commas, some could be replaced and/ or removed. Also, your entire entry doesn't have to be underlined I don't believe. One other thing is that your entry is about sports medicine but only speaks of primarily sports medicine specialists and doctors.

In the second entry I like how you further explain how sports medicine specialists become what they are. Then you go on to talk specifically about sports medicine, which is very interesting and very full of information from your neutral, and reliable source. A few things that I would recommend is that you talk about the specialists, talk about the medicine and then talk about the specialists again so maybe you can talk about the specialists all at once and then talk about the medicine or vice versa. Also through both entries you have no in text citations, which is an easy fix, all you have to do is curser where you want the citation and hit at the top "cite" and then hit re-use and pick either 1 or 2 depending on what source it is from. (JMott2 (talk) 13:49, 19 November 2019 (UTC))