User talk:Sorean

Proposed deletion of Survival Redemption


The article Survival Redemption has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This is an unreferenced plot synopsis of an unidentified drama, film, book or whatever. No notability asserted.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peridon (talk) 21:15, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, but...
You can't just use Wikipedia as free webspace. If your story is still being written or developed, it's just not going to fit WP:GNG and other policies, including WP:CRYSTAL. This applies to anyone below the sales level of the likes of J.K. Rowling or Dan Brown - and even there there has to be solid evidence not just rumour. Apart from which, why give away your plot before publication? Please look at those policies and see if you do comply with them - and at WP:RS reliable sources (which you can't really have if it's not even finished. The plot does look interesting - a cross between dystopia and fantasy (look at both those links...) - but you are going to have to be tighter on your word control and spelling. Publishers do use proof-readers but are less likely to look at badly spelled scripts. I wish you luck with it - but the time is not yet right for Wikipedia article status. Peridon (talk) 15:08, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Survival Redemption
There's a proper template for doing this but I can't find it. This is to let you know that I've nominated your article for deletion at Articles for Deletion. You are welcome to state your case for not deleting (or for deleting - I've seen that happen) there, but please do take note of what I've said. Don't remove the template on the article - you aren't allowed to do that like you are with a Proposed Deletion (prod) one. It'll only get some people narky if you do and it won't help you. When you do manage to get references together, feel free to contact me and I'll give you help with re-creating the article to fit our standards. Do keep wqorking on the story - it may never get anywhere (but it might...), but practice is important. Don't throw old stuff away - I kept a paragraph for I won't say how long - and now it's a story (and I need to chase my illustrator up about it too...). Good luck. Peridon (talk) 18:49, 24 November 2010 (UTC)