User talk:Sorenspete

Disambiguation link notification for June 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ola Englund, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Testament and Entombed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Steve Lukather
I removed your recent edit there, as something being spotted in a YouTube video is not really a great source of relevant information. If he gives an interview or a journalist writes about his use of that equipment being notable, we could add it to the article. Otherwise, it's trivia. -- Laser brain  (talk)  03:38, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

I have no idea if this is how users communicate - by editing these messages, but I checked his website and it does confirm that he is now using Bogners. If it's okay I'll do another edit and cite his site. I'm not a seasoned editor, so thanks for your guidance!

PS. here is the link: http://www.stevelukather.com/artist/gear.aspx


 * Yes, this is a good way to communicate—although you should sign your messages (you do this by typing "-- Laser brain  (talk)  10:47, 12 June 2015 (UTC)" at the end of your message). So now we now Lukather is using Bogners. Do you feel like his use of the amps is notable in some way? Obviously his guitar choice is notable because he has is own signature model. However, it's always been my position that we should limit how much equipment we talk about for guitarists to what is remarkable. Thoughts? -- Laser brain   (talk)  10:47, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

I take your point as fair. We might simply add that SL keeps the 'gear' section of his website up to date and that information on his current rig can be found there, and only add historically significant factoids. Maybe in 5 years his switch to Bogner will be significant, and you're right that it isn't really significant right now (compared to his endorsement of EBMM).

-- Sorenspete  (talk)  13:58, 13 June 2015 (GMT+12)


 * Good idea. Thanks. -- Laser brain  (talk)  10:25, 13 June 2015 (UTC)