User talk:Sorrow of Sophie

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello, Sorrow of Sophie, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place  on this page and someone will drop by to help. FunksBrother (talk) 00:35, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Your first article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
 * And feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

Disambiguation link notification for February 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lolita fashion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gothic ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Lolita_fashion check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Lolita_fashion?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Sorrow of Sophie, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Lolita fashion have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:17, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Lolita fashion - too many redirects
See here. There are too many redirects. Some variants of Lolita there were described in article before 2017. But article lost meritorical value (see statistics at years count). In ENwiki there aren't articles like to d:Q27920 or sweet lolita. Regards. Dawid2009 (talk) 18:57, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorrow of Sophie, regardless of the merits of the redirects or otherwise, you can't use WP:PROD to delete redirects -- please use WP:RFD instead. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 00:51, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Dawid2009 Thank you for your message, I think you have your answer, if you really want to cleanup/remove the redirects, I suggest to request it by yourself. People gave me tips to look at WP:RFD, WP:CHEAP and don't forget to look at WP:COSTLY. I trust you that you can make your own judgment. I have done my best to improve to redirect description by adding R tags for clarity why these are redirect to the Lolita fashion Wikipedia page, in addition I have correct the redirect to just the Wikipedia page instead of non existent section of the page at the Lolita Wikipedia page. Yours Sincerely, Sorrow of Sophie (talk) 13:22, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 16:38, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 15:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 20:40, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

January 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 23:37, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Reply to previous decline
 * Thank you for your message Deepfriedokra. I understand wherefore I was blocked. I was blocked, because I used an alternative account with an illegitimate reason and this attracts scrutiny. It would only be legitimate if I had notified to a checkuser or members of the arbitration committee about my alternative account, but I didn't therefore I had violated the policy of Wikipedia. I promise I will not violate the policy for creating illegitimate alternative accounts again in the future. Instead I will help out Wikipedia and will take a look at the Community portal and try to Fix wikilinks, Check and add references and Fix original research issues. I did already did some edits offline by copying the online text to a text editor, but because I cannot edit the pages I will hold them offline until I can edit again. Sorrow of Sophie (talk) 23:59, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Comments
 * I don't see that you have made any productive contributions to this project since creating your account well over three years ago. Thousands of edits to your userspace and about 200 to article space, and those edits have been SPA-like and mostly a waste of time. In addition, your sock account's comments were, not surprisingly, also a waste of the community's time. Editors are here to improve the project, not indulge in long-winded debates about ethics on the Internet.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:01, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I hear you Bbb23. But I guarantee you even if the article based are SPA-like they were all done with the intention of creating a neutral perspective based on reliable sources. I respect highly the NPOV and verifiability criteria, because an encyclopedia should contain different viewpoints and not one-sided viewpoint. For the user space my goal was to share lists of topics of Wikpedia sorted under categories. Also I created a library of a list of books and literature authors with consideration of NPOV. These lists were all done so that people could broader their perspective of the world if they like and encourage them to read more articles from this encyclopedia. Also to you I promise I won't indulge in long-winded debates about ethics on in the internet, because it wastes valuable time of mine co-Wikipedians. Sorrow of Sophie (talk) 23:59, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

27 January 2020 Unblock Request 2.0 Second Reflection (Draft) Thank you for your time. It is a delight to give mine reasoning. My answer is based on what I wrote in the previous unblock request but in more amazing and courteous ways (compare it with web 1.0 vs web 2.0):
 * The block I have is not necessary anymore because I won't damage or disrupt Wikipedia ever again. I will adhere to Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines and I will try to prevent any more damage or disruption against the foundation of Wikipedia. I am blocked, because I didn't deliberative with the community how to use an alternative account. If someone wants to use such account for such purpose, just ask and follow the Policies and guidelines and the underlying procedures, I fully agree.
 * As I early said I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, because it was never my intention and I am in debt to the editors, founder and operational people. Thanks to these people a lot of people have the opportunities to learn more about the world. Wikipedia had as goal to create a neutral encyclopedia, even if not all articles are neutral. We as community try our best to make it as neutral as possible and work friendly as possible. Of course people differ in opinions, courtesy and ways, but reflect, be civil against each other, criticise with virtue briefly and everything is fine. A block is not meant to punish people but to stop people from disrupting the ecosystem of Wikipedia.
 * I promise om the Wikipedia Oath I will make useful contributions instead and contribute to Wikipedia itself, it is my pleasure to this. I will improve Wikipedia on all layers and levels where opportunities emerge. As you may notice I read a lot about Wikipedia and Wikimedia (Meta). I am not called for nothing Sorrow of Sophie. Firstly you have the content based things seen in Community portal, also you have the collaborate part WikiProject and lastly we have our WikiFauna. I am going to contribute first before going to other levels to Fix spelling and grammar, Fix wikilinks. Update with new information, Check and add references, Fix original research issues to the other categories I might also do too. If I am going to deal with things in realm of subparagraph criticism, controversy, living people, policy or anything close related to Wikipedia I will consider the philosophy of Wikipedia with his Five pillars, interests and benefits for Wikipedia as whole. Second you have monitoring: the edits by auto-patrol; protecting the privacy of people by overseers; reduce disruption, vandalism and conflict resolutions partially done by admins and Checkusers. also do not forget the people who are doing the technical stuff and bots and the administration works bureaucrats and stewards (and Wikimedia (Meta) for improving the whole infrastructure). Third if I am going to make any edits which can be a little bit controversial I will ask briefly if it is worth the interest depending on the context and time and will evaluate my own judgement about what is necessary. A sharp Wikipedian judgement will be created, because that is wonderful for the people, processes and ecosystem. After all I was and still am inspired by all Wikipedia Principles. So when I am unblocked I will enjoy the ride to do amazing things for Wikipedia by an Wikipedian.

Wonderstruck --Sorrow of Sophie (talk) 17:02, 12 January 2020 (UTC), Luminated --Sorrow of Sophie (talk) 18:38, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

May 2021
For the reviewing administrator, I have used my checkuser tools and verified no evidence of recent sockpuppetry or block evasion. Therefore, non-checkuser admins may review this unblock request and accept or decline the request as they see fit. --Yamla (talk) 20:56, 17 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you Yamla. Sorrow of Sophie I am going to discuss this matter with the blocking administration and get their opinion on the matter before I proceed with reviewing this request. Thank you for your patience. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 11:13, 5 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for you considerations HighInBC, I read the discussion. Firstly, I am not blocked on any other Wikipedia. Secondly, that I have so many edits on userspace that cannot be undone and is what it is and that blocking administration didn't like the way I write is probably because of mine first unblock request in which I was more focussed on the policy itself, in addition the block administration worried I could sockpuppet again, but why would I want to sockpuppet what would I gain from it, other then not respecting the community policy and avoid scrutiny. I hope this extra comment brighten what my intention is. Thirdly, the reason I have so little post-edits is because I am blocked to make any edits. A year ago my idea was to stash the edits when I got unblock, but I have seen it was very problematic to copy and stash it in a notepad file, because the Wikipedia page changed within the time frame. I saw some mistakes on some pages, but couldn't fix it like dead references. I looked into the projects in which I could contribute, because before the block I wasn't aware of the Community portal and how policy and guidelines came into consensus. Thanks to community portal I saw which work could be done and I would like to contribute. Sorrow of Sophie (talk) 08:48, 18 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I stand by my review however another administrator may feel differently, if so I have no objection. They will want to talk to the blocking admin though. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 08:57, 18 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I understand and I respect your decision 100%. I wish you a good life and stay healthy in these turbulence time of COVID-19. Sorrow of Sophie (talk) 09:05, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Rugby union in Honduras
Rugby union in Honduras is a minor, but growing sport.

According to the World Bank, the population of Honduras in 2019 is 9,746,117.

The first two teams started physical training in 2012.

...

Maddogz Rugby Club, El Mochito, Santa Barbara, Honduras Maddogz was formed in 2013 by Canadian Jerry Boucher and the majority of players are miners in the El Mochito mine.

...

Rugby Clubs (External Links)
 * Lenca Rugby Honduras
 * Rugby Tegucigalpa Honduras
 * Pirates Rugby Club, Roatan, Honduras
 * Rugby Marcala Honduras

References (Not referred)
 * http://www.intouchrugby.com/magazine/john-mccourt-and-jason-turner-teach-big-hits/
 * http://www.diez.hn/mobile/mfotogallerias/488202-235/el-rugby-un-deporte-que-crece-en-honduras?PICID=751065
 * http://www.intouchrugby.com/magazine/john-mccourt-and-jason-turner-teach-big-hits/
 * http://www.diez.hn/mobile/mfotogallerias/488202-235/el-rugby-un-deporte-que-crece-en-honduras?PICID=751065
 * http://www.diez.hn/mobile/mfotogallerias/488202-235/el-rugby-un-deporte-que-crece-en-honduras?PICID=751065

Talkpage Rugby union in Honduras:

I have dug into this topic and unfortunately very scarce sources are available which can verify the current written information, but the sources found are added to the article. Sorrow of Sophie (talk) 07:36, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Adventure therapy
Adventure therapy is a form of psychotherapy created in the 1960s under the name wilderness therapy. it wasn't until the 70s adventure programs were developed, in australia for example the first adventure therapy program started in 1979 It is influenced by a variety of theories such as behavior theory and systems theory. Experiential education is the defining basis for adventure therapy.

...

These increases may then be generalized to treatment outcomes within and across life domains.

...

One of the first of these programs was Salesmanship Club Camp, Notes

Bibliography

Moote GT Jr, Wodarski JS. The acquisition of life skills through adventure-based activities and programs: a review of the literature. Adolescence. 1997 Spring;32(125):143-67. PMID: 9105498.

Jillis, H.L., Simpson, C. A., Thomsen, D. D., & Martin, B. A. (1995). Final evaluation of project adventure's co-op program for court referred, drug involved youth. Online.

Parker, M. W. (1992). Impact of adventure interventions of traditional counseling interventions (ropes course). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma.

Ziven, H. S. (1988) The effects of the challenge group treatment program on psychiatrically hospitalized adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts School of Professional Psychology, Massachusetts.

Cherkizovo
Infobox update:

Key people: Igor Babaev (Chairman of the Board of Directors 2005-2006), Evgeny Igorevich Mikhaylov (Chairman of the Board, Director of Business Development 2006-Present)

In May 2011, Cherkizovo completed the acquisition of 100% of Mosselprom, a company specializing in the production of poultry products. It costed Cherkizovo $252.9 million, of which $183.8 million was Mosselprom's debt. Part of the deal was paid for with shares of Cherkizovo itself.

In March 2014 ... tons per year).