User talk:Sosoman78

Notability of Chaos Software (company)
seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. --Android Mouse Bot 2 13:18, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. &mdash; The Sunshine  Man 15:05, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Chaos Game Engine, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a. If you can indicate how Chaos Game Engine is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Chaos Game Engine saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. &mdash; The Sunshine  Man 17:13, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Do not remove speedy tags
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles, as you did with Chaos Game Engine. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following: Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --OnoremDil 10:52, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Place   on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
 * 2) Make your case on the article's talk page.

Deletions
I am not an admin, and am unable to delete or restore articles. The most likely reason that the article was deleted was that it did not have references to demonstrate notability. If you can add independent third-party references, you can appeal the deletion at Deletion review. --Eastmain 10:28, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Chaos Software, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. It might be a good idea for you to figure out why these articles are being deleted instead of just continuing to recreate inappropriate articles. You need to establish notability using reliable sources. --OnoremDil 10:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Chaos Game Engine, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DarkSaber2k 11:39, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DarkSaber2k 11:41, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from an article you created, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  DarkSaber2k 11:44, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

HeroEngine
Tagging a notable piece of software for deletion just to make a point is a violation of Wikipedia policy. Notice what that article has that Chaos Game Engine does have: an assertion of notability, and sources. -FisherQueen (Talk) 11:47, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Chaos engine
Hi. I think that their are a number of concerns as detailed above which have led to the multiple deletions of this article. The article does not provide independent verifiable sources that it meets the notability guidelines. It is unlikely to be able to do so at present since it is new and there are no publicly announced games using this solution. I reads like an advert, with no independent evaluation, and the only link being to the company site. I think your deletion of tags has also been unhelpful since it suggests that you are avoiding evaluation of your article. It's also pointless after the first deletion because suspicious folk like me check for recreation. Hope this helps,  Jimfbleak . Talk to me. 11:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Removing tags
You are not accomplishing anything by continuously removing appropriate tags. It's likely that it is already too late for you to avoid being blocked because of your disruptive editing. I recommend that you work on creating an acceptable article at User:Sosoman78/Chaos Game Engine once your block expires, and be sure to use reliable sources that establish notability before you attempt to create this article again. --OnoremDil 12:02, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated.
 * I cannot review your block, having blocked you myself, but I suggest you create the article in subpage of your userspace, and allow an experienced editor to review it. Regards, – Riana ⁂  12:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry - OK, create the article in this page - User:Sosoman78/Chaos Game Machine. – Riana ⁂  12:18, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Chaos Software (company)
Please read WP:CORP. The issue is not the format of the article, but the notability (or more specifically, the lack of notability) of the subject. Until you accept that you must provide sourcing to establish the notability of your articles, they will likely continue to be deleted as being non-notable. And if you recreate then too often, they will be blocked from further recreation,, as was done with the company article. - TexasAndroid 13:02, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

So what?
So what if it didn't have any notable links on the page? It had facts and that should be more than enough to create an article about anything. Good to see that your rules of stupidity successfully alienate every new entity and object in existence. Congrats Sosoman78 11:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Please read our core policy on verifiability. If information cannot be verified, it cannot be relied on. An encyclopedia is a sumamrization of previously published information. If it hasn't been published before, it cannot be included in Wikipedia. Tanks, Gwernol 11:57, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Chaos Game Engine (game engine)
Here is the page with a link to an outside article that mentions the engine for "notability". Can I create a page with this now? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sosoman78/Chaos_Game_Machine Sosoman78 14:13, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Not really. That's an interview on a fan news site that only mentions the game engine briefly. What you need are multiple, non-trivial, reliable sources. Multiple means more than one. Non-trivial means the source is substantially about the Chaos game engine. Reliable means the source is a reputable, recognized, independent publication (e.g. The New York Times, CNN or a book published by a major publishing house). You are moving in the right direction with this source, but you need more and better sources to establish notability. Gwernol 14:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * And let me state officially that if this user can come up with sources to satisfy any other admin about sourcing of the main chaos company article, I have no problem with that other admin undoing the salting of the company page. - TexasAndroid 13:09, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Repost of Chaos MMO Engine
was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD) --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:50, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Final warning: stop reposting your article
You have yet again recreated this article, this time at Chaos game engine. Again there are no sources to show notability. As you are persistently creating this article without following the specific requests for proper sources to show notability, I can only conclude that you have no intention of stopping this disruptive activity. If you do this again I will indefinitely block this account to prevent further disruption. Please consider this your only warning. If you do not understand the concept of notability, feel free to drop me a note on my talk page and I can help you out further, but continually recreating the same article is not acceptable. Gwernol 13:22, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


 * At this point, you really need to do the user space work route, where you get the page created in your user space, work on it there until you can get it to a state where it will pass the notability requirements (and get other people to review whether they pass or not), and then get them moved into the article space. You have been given a final warning about creating these articles in article space in their current form.  Unless you want this account blocked, you need to no longer consider that an option.  But the user-space option definitely still exists.  - TexasAndroid 13:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. - TexasAndroid 20:24, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. - TexasAndroid 14:34, 19 July 2007 (UTC)