User talk:Sososos321

May 2010
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to The National Enquirer. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.'''The TNE is not a reliable source. Please see WP:BLP if you have further questions. '''--Morenooso (talk) 02:48, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to The National Enquirer, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. '''Rush Limbaugh is not WP:RS either and very anti-Obama. '''--Morenooso (talk) 02:50, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I never used Rush Limbaugh as a source, you must be referring to this edit?  Sorry but that's about the Enquirer breaking the news dealing with Limbaugh's drug addiction and taken off the Limbaugh wikipedia article.  The source is CNN and it has nothing to do with Obama.

You have violated the three-revert rule. Any administrator may now choose to block your account. In the future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further, instead of edit warring.--Morenooso (talk) 02:51, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to The National Enquirer, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 05:24, 3 May 2010 (UTC)