User talk:Soulauthor

Speedy deletion of Traumtheater (musical)
A tag has been placed on Traumtheater (musical) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Pontificalibus (talk) 18:34, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Traumtheater (musical)
A tag has been placed on Traumtheater (musical) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Pontificalibus (talk) 18:42, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Traum-Theater (musical)
A tag has been placed on Traum-Theater (musical) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Pontificalibus (talk) 18:43, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Pontificalibus (talk) 18:51, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Traum-Theater (Choir of Mainstockheim musical)
A tag has been placed on Traum-Theater (Choir of Mainstockheim musical) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Pontificalibus (talk) 18:52, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of "Like a Lady"
A tag has been placed on "Like a Lady", requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Davnor (talk) 13:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

September 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Traumtheater (musical), as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. ItsZippy (talk) 18:07, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Traumtheater (musical) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Alex discussion ★ 18:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Die Stimme der Muyen (musical) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Clarince63 (talk) 18:11, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you harm Wikipedia, as you did at Die Stimme der Muyen (musical) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Clarince63 (talk) 18:12, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, settle down everybody. Soulauthor blanks the page, which you should read as an attempt at db-author--an attempt I will turn down, since they are not the only author (see the history). Instead, I will redirect it--if y'all will please stop accusing a not-so-seasoned editor of vandalism. Soulauthor, I'm sorry, but since you are not the only author we cannot let you blank it. Instead, since the subject is not notable, I will redirect it to Choir of Mainstockheim. Please disregard the warnings. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 18:14, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Soulauthor, please take my advice and leave those articles (now redirects) alone. Drmies (talk) 18:21, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello everybody, I am Soulauthor, and I'm sorry that I've blanked all the pages, but I want to do. I'm the only person who created the pages about the Choir of Mainstockheim and its musicals. So, in my opinion, it's my right to blank them. The content is not that good, and my English as well. Furthermore I don't own the copyright of all the pictures I've uploaded. So please help me to blank only these few pages. I hope you understand me! :) soulauthor (talk), 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Choir of Mainstockheim for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Choir of Mainstockheim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Choir of Mainstockheim until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 18:19, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 18:24, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * By now, your edits, though they may be in good faith, are disruptive and I have temporarily blocked your account to prevent you from making more of a mess that I have to clean up. I have explained, above, what is incorrect about your edits, yet you persist in blanking pages that by now are just redirects. I urge you to acquaint yourself with the guidelines that pertain here (see Blanking, and the inapplicability of CSD section G7). Thank you. Drmies (talk) 18:27, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently blanking articles, despite being given explanation that this is unhelpful. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:29, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Choir of Mainstockheim, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Marek. 69  talk  15:48, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Choir of Mainstockheim has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you.   Wikipelli Talk   15:54, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Choir of Mainstockheim with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Marek. 69  talk  15:57, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to Choir of Mainstockheim. Marek. 69  talk  15:59, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Soulauthor, I'm not sure what else to do. You've received many warnings and been blocked briefly twice before for randomly blanking articles and talk pages. Since you have not communicated at all, I have disabled this account until you decide to explain your actions. Sorry. Kuru  (talk)  14:03, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * They stated their intention clearly here. I see no problem with their blanking and have tagged the blanked pages with db-author.--Pontificalibus (talk) 14:17, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * That's an inexcusable miss on my part. I did not look back far enough to see that message from a week ago. Soulauthor, please accept my apologies.   Kuru   (talk)  14:27, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your apology! And thank you, that you've helped me and that you blanked the pages "Die Stimme der Muyen" and "Traumtheater". Now, I wanted to ask, if you could blank all the images that I've uploaded for the pages which I created? - It would be very very nice! (message from Soulauthor, 13 September 2011)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2no


A tag has been placed on 2no, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pontificalibus (talk) 14:10, 13 September 2011 (UTC)