User talk:SoundGuyAndy

Reverted edit
No need to take offense to the revert- it was nothing against your edit. It was more the way you worded your statement; it looked as if you were linking to the website to promote it, though that wasn't your intent. Most commercial links are removed from articles, unless they're particularly relevant. For example, linking to hotmail.com in the article on hotmail would be appropriate; linking to hotmail.com on the article on e-mail would be inappropriate, despite hotmail originally being one of the most popular services.

Since the material is historically relevant, you can just add the text into the article again without the link. Right now I'll do a quick sweep of the article, since some advertising seems to have snuck in. You can check WP:EL for more on external links on Wikipedia if you'd like.

The reason I called your edit an "experiment" was because it was your first edit, it looked like mistaken advertising, and because I was using a warning template and figured that this wasn't vandalism. Whether you are with Kohr's or not had nothing to do with it.

Also, for future reference, add new messages to the bottoms of talk pages. --Wafulz 04:25, 31 August 2006 (UTC)