User talk:SounderBruce/Archive 28

DYK for Lynnwood, Washington
Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Major League Rugby
Hi SounderBruce, in saying 'league uses "grand" in title' when editing here, could you please explain where this came from (to clarify what you mean)? Thanks, -- Ham105 (talk) 18:57, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Seems I was mistaken when I created the article. I don't see a set name from the league or secondary sources, other than the rather generic "championship" (which refers to the entire playoffs).  Sounder Bruce  19:14, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks. The term "grand final" is commonly used in Australia, where I'm located, although around the world in general it's not used so much. The simpler "final" is preferred – see 2017 Super Rugby Final or 2018 FIFA World Cup Final, as examples. The two terms nowadays describe much the same concept, although a century ago the description Grand Final was usually reserved for when a right of challenge was exercised. But I digress. Anyway, in my view, "2018 Major League Rugby Final" would be a better fit for the name of the page. Thoughts? -- Ham105 (talk) 20:29, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Kent station (Sound Transit)
Gatoclass (talk) 01:16, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

DYK for South Tacoma station
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:36, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

DYK for List of international goals scored by Javier Hernández
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:21, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

DYK for USL New Mexico
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:21, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Las Vegas Lights FC
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:22, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Please help me understand
Please help me understand why you estimated this edit as not constructive? Before 2018 France had won a "single" world cup, which is more informative than "last". I'd like to AGF for your revert so please help. --5ko (talk) 18:27, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Oops. I assumed from the edit summary that this was a troll edit in the post-match section (e.g. this being France's "last and only" one), given that vandalism will inevitably strike the article for a while. Apologies.  Sounder Bruce  18:29, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interstate 86 (Idaho)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Interstate 86 (Idaho) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 22:20, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interstate 86 (Idaho)
The article Interstate 86 (Idaho) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Interstate 86 (Idaho) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 23:20, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interstate 86 (Idaho)
The article Interstate 86 (Idaho) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Interstate 86 (Idaho) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 23:41, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Courthouse station (San Diego Trolley)
Hello! Your submission of Courthouse station (San Diego Trolley) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:20, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Reply to Message from jul 19 2018
Thank you for telling me my mistake. So we have to site all the changes we make correct? I have been looking at the links you posted and they seem helpful. I guess for now I have to stay as a grammar Nazi until I figure out how to cite correctly. Davidboosgarzaj (talk) 16:53, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Whatcom Transit wiki. page
Dear Sounder Bruce,

You reverted my recent edits to the WTA (Whatcom Transit Authority), because you said the information that I had provided was not constructive. The information I provided gave more information that was correct about the different buses in the fleet, which seems constructive. Also the version you reverted it to was from 2013, while the version that was on was the most current fleet as of July 2018. If you want to remove my edits please have a solid reason, but please sort change the correct info to out dated information.

-Whatcom.county1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whatcom.county1 (talk • contribs) 05:55, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mukilteo station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Northern Railway ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Mukilteo_station check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Mukilteo_station?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Las Vegas Lights FC
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Las Vegas Lights FC you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 09:21, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Las Vegas Lights FC
The article Las Vegas Lights FC you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Las Vegas Lights FC for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 08:41, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stanwood station
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stanwood station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 22:20, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stanwood station
The article Stanwood station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stanwood station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 23:41, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Courthouse station (San Diego Trolley)
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Las Vegas Lights FC
The article Las Vegas Lights FC you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Las Vegas Lights FC for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 12:21, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

MAX Blue Line
Hey SounderBruce! Thanks for catching my errors on the MAX Blue Line article. Your username sounds familiar. Were you by any chance in that SC4 union/project USNW? --Truflip99 (talk) 14:48, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Wow, that's a name I haven't heard in a long time. It's a shame that it fizzled out, and I haven't touched my copy of SC4 in a while.  Sounder Bruce  00:01, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Word. Not sure if you'd remember, but this is diz. :) Truflip99 (talk) 00:18, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Whatcom Transit wiki. page
Please stop changing the correct information about the fleet back to old and outdated info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Owen.331 (talk • contribs) 18:38, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Interstate 86 (Idaho)
Vanamonde (talk) 00:01, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Whatcom Transit wiki. page
PLEASE STOP REVERTING THE UPDATES YOU ARE TAKING AWAY FROM THE PAGE!!! STOP MAKING WRONGFUL ALLEGATIONS!!! STOP BULLYING SMALL PEOPLE WHO MAKE UPDATES!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Owen.331 (talk • contribs) 03:41, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Seattle demonyms
Hi Bruce,

You reverted my addition of two additional demonyms for residents of Seattle. The information comes from Labels for Locals, by Paul Dickson. He lists Seattleite as the main demonym, but gives Seattlites and Seattlers as variants, with citation of sources. So I didn't do original research, I used a reliable source. I can go into Wikidata and add the two variants with sources. There's also now a Wikidata page for Seattleites: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q55779668

Adam Schiff University of Washington Libraries — Preceding unsigned comment added by UWashCataloging (talk • contribs) 02:04, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the information. You'll need to directly cite the information using an appropriate citation template (e.g. cite book). I'd hazard against putting it in the infobox, which is reserved for a summary of the article as a whole and should have only one demonym to reduce reader confusion. The Nicknames section would be the most appropriate place to add alternate demonyms. But from what I can see, Dickson's book is based on what the national media uses in various reports, and only cites "Seattler" to a 1959 piece in Newsweek. The archives of the Seattle Times seems to have only used Seattler a few times, mostly in the 1950s, and Seattlite only 100 times (mostly in quotes); Seattleite is by far the most common term.
 * Also, linking directly to Wikidata items can be done with Q, but should be done only in certain situations.  Sounder Bruce  04:51, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Stanwood station
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

DYK for H & H Railroad
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stanwood, Washington
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stanwood, Washington you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AmericanAir88 -- AmericanAir88 (talk) 15:40, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

question about edits and sources
Thanks for the feedback. This news release by the Seattle Times says specifically that the machine "overheated and stalled" Just trying to clear up what actually happened. Whether the pipe is the cause is still under court review.

Also, there is no source to support that the cutterhead was damaged when it was lifted up, all of the sources cite the seal assembly being damaged.

Thanks! Bertraj (talk) 20:59, 30 July 2018 (UTC)bertraj

Your edits were flagged for having deleted a lot of content off the page. Please go back and add corrections, but preserve the existing content by explaining that the media reports were retracted or corrected by WSDOT (with sources, of course).  Sounder Bruce  21:06, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 169
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Washington State Route 169 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 17:40, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 169
The article Washington State Route 169 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Washington State Route 169 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 18:01, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Orcas
I started User:Bri/J-50 just a day before you started Tahlequah (orca)! Not sure my draft has enough material yet. If you saw anything else on J-50 while doing your research, could you let me know? ☆ Bri (talk) 06:49, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The article I wrote has some references to The Whale Museum, which has a lot of information on the individuals and their lineage. It might be premature to give J-50 her own page, so perhaps we should wait until further news comes out.  Sounder Bruce  06:53, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Front page of The Seattle Times today ... incorporated and moved to article J-50. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:10, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The article should probably be moved to Scarlet (orca), based on her name.  Sounder Bruce  21:06, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I considered that but don't know if the name is official. Nothing I saw from NOAA mentioned it. I don't think it even appears in today's Times story. ☆ Bri (talk) 21:08, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The unofficial names (but generally accepted by most media outlets) are given by The Whale Museum and other reputable organizations. Precedence at Category:Individual killer whales seems to suggest that we use them.  Sounder Bruce  23:47, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 169
The article Washington State Route 169 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Washington State Route 169 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 12:41, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stanwood, Washington
The article Stanwood, Washington you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stanwood, Washington for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AmericanAir88 -- AmericanAir88 (talk) 13:41, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Stanwood, Washington
Hello! Your submission of Stanwood, Washington at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! All that is needed is for the QPQ to be completed. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:47, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Page move proposal: Utah Warriors (rugby union)
Would you like to comment on the Utah Warriors (rugby union) Requested move proposal? -- Ham105 (talk) 06:08, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

AirTrain JFK FAC
Hi, this FAC is languishing for want of review and I thought it might be your line of country -- would you care to take a look? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:08, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll take a look, though I don't have experience in reviewing an FAC.  Sounder Bruce  00:02, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Seattle head tax
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Seattle head tax you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Seattle head tax
The article Seattle head tax you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Seattle head tax for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 03:02, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 8
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Washington State Route 240 ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Washington_State_Route_240 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Washington_State_Route_240?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Yakima Valley
 * Washington State Route 505 ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Washington_State_Route_505 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Washington_State_Route_505?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Spirit Lake

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Signal Hill Mall (2nd nomination)
I added a few more sources to the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:57, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 397
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Washington State Route 397 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Crystallis -- Nova Crystallis (talk) 04:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

MAX Light Rail
Hey! Just a heads up, looks like User:Truflip99 is working on many MAX Light Rail-related articles (see contributions), which is great! You may or may not be interested in collaborating, but I just wanted to put this on your radar in case you care to follow along. Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 02:52, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

2018 Sea-Tac airplane theft
I looked at this diff, but did not see an issue with the sources? It is true that Twitter and Tweets are generally not reliable, but in some cases they are. This is one of those cases. The tweets are also being referenced in the news at the moment and are the source for most of what is known at present. If you have further concerns, please take them to the talk page. -- The SandDoctor Talk 05:35, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Per WP:INTEXT, passages like Pierce County Sheriff's Department utilized Twitter as its official news feed are inappropriate. In the long run, it will not be important.  Sounder Bruce  05:38, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
 * True, but that could have been trimmed out and the rest most likely left until more information becomes available. The tweets are a lot of what we have right now. -- The SandDoctor Talk 05:41, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 397
The article Washington State Route 397 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Washington State Route 397 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Crystallis -- Nova Crystallis (talk) 06:42, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Idaho State Highway 41
I noticed you reverted my edit on the southern terminus of State Highway 41. Seltice Way is technically the southern end of the highway, and is part of the I-90 / Highway 41 interchange (You have to travel along Seltice Way traveling from eastbound I-90 to northbound Highway 41. Moreover, The eastbound on-ramp from southbound Highway 41 shares the same intersection as Highway 41 / Seltice Way). If it cannot be listed as the same junction in the infobox, the southern end should be Seltice Way, and Interstate 90 should just be a junction. Howpper (talk) 23:56, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Edit: Please correct me if I'm wrong. Howpper (talk) 00:00, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Infoboxes are supposed to summarize the basic details of a subject, not necessarily to total accuracy. Seltice Way is part of the I-90 interchange, but cannot be considered the true terminus based on common sense (ITD does not usually have routes ending at random city streets). I will also be reverting your edits at US 195, as it's not common sense to list junctions with a highway that was decommissioned over 60 years ago.  Sounder Bruce  02:58, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 15
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Washington State Route 240 ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Washington_State_Route_240 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Washington_State_Route_240?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Atomic Energy Commission
 * Washington State Route 823 ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Washington_State_Route_823 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Washington_State_Route_823?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Yakima Valley
 * Washington State Route 900 ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Washington_State_Route_900 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Washington_State_Route_900?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Lake Washington Floating Bridge

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Enjoyed Reading About you in Slate
I appreciate that they presented your remarks at length. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 22:38, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:51, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Tahlequah (orca)
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Not a timetable
Undid your edit on MAX Blue Line. Travel time was not meant to serve as a timetable, it serves as distance measurement. The information was not even acquired from timetables. They are not subject to sporadic change and are permanent on the official MAX map. --Truflip99 (talk) 03:47, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * It's unclear and confusing to readers what the travel time represents, as it's overlaying across a lot of stations; one might interpret this as applying to all stations under the umbrella. The other half of my edit (breaking up the large blanks in the table) are also part of MOS and should be restored; the table should also be made sortable, as there's multiple sortkeys (sequence, opening dates, parking lot sizes, and station names in alphabetical order).  Sounder Bruce  03:54, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay, followed MOS. Removed Travel Time too. Not sure about making it sortable. --Truflip99 (talk) 06:51, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 240
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Washington State Route 240 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 15:01, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 821
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Washington State Route 821 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 15:01, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 821
The article Washington State Route 821 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Washington State Route 821 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 21:22, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Stanwood, Washington
Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 240
The article Washington State Route 240 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Washington State Route 240 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 02:02, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Seattle Wiknic 2018
01:22, 19 August 2018 (UTC) To unsubscribe from future messages from Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list.

Burns Commons (The Hop)
Besides being dangerously close to being a case of WP:Bite the newbies WP:BITE, if you feel that "Streetcar stops are generally not notable", then you need to prune Category:Muni Metro stations. Useddenim (talk) 11:58, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Newbie or not, creating permastubs on what amounts to a bus stop-like landmark is not permitted under the notability guidelines. There's been discussions about deleting the Muni Metro stops (and only keeping the actual LRT-like stations), and plenty of other North American systems do not have individual articles about stops (Toronto, Seattle, Portland, New Orleans, Kansas City). The only exception seems to be Detroit (which should be reconsidered) and this one Milwaukee stop.  Sounder Bruce  22:10, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Apologies for being unclear. I was questioning “Why this one article?”, not objecting to the WP:PROD per se. Other than with Cleveland’s HealthLine (Adelbert Road, Cornell Road and a few “East $n$th Street” pages), there’s been no progress in eliminating these non-notable stubs. Useddenim (talk) 21:25, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Washington State Turnpike
I am affiliated with WashDOT, and therefore I can confirm that the Washington State Turnpike is indeed a proposal. However, the reason why no public sources have discussed it yet is because the proposal was just released to the public last week, and the immediate positive/negative criticism came directly to WashDOT board of communications from high-level residents. 24.34.85.169 (talk) 13:25, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Therefore, it cannot be added because it is not supported by reliable sources. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus  (talk to me) 13:28, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 22
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * MAX Yellow Line ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/MAX_Yellow_Line check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/MAX_Yellow_Line?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Portland City Hall
 * Washington State Route 28 ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Washington_State_Route_28 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Washington_State_Route_28?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Rock Island State Park
 * Washington State Route 500 ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Washington_State_Route_500 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Washington_State_Route_500?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Expressway

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of U.S. Bicycle Route 66
Hello! Your submission of U.S. Bicycle Route 66 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Hughesdarren (talk) 08:59, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * A note for future interesting expansion. Lots of bicyclists plan trips to follow prevailing winds, so as to have a tailwind vice headwind. I think this is discussed in Bicycling the Pacific Coast especially because the wind changes reliably depending on season. Not sure how it would affect a LA-to-Chicago route or the reverse. ☆ Bri (talk) 03:40, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Denny Way
Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Spire (Seattle building)
Vanamonde (talk) 00:01, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

In the media
I think you were obliquely mentioned on a podcast called Obsessed. Some more info in the upcoming edition of The Signpost. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:26, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Those edits were well before I started writing transit articles, from what I can recall. Still was an interesting episode to listen to.  Sounder Bruce  03:37, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Station Square station (PAAC), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KDKA ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Station_Square_station_%28PAAC%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Station_Square_station_%28PAAC%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 September newsletter
The fourth round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The eight users who made it to the final round had to score a minimum of 422 points to qualify, with the top score in the round being 4869 points. The leaders in round 4 were:


 * Courcelles scored a magnificent 4869 points, with 92 good articles on Olympics-related themes. Courcelles' bonus points alone exceeded the total score of any of the other contestants!
 * Kees08 was second with 1155 points, including a high-scoring featured article for Neil Armstrong, two good topics and some Olympics-related good articles.
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Cas Liber, with 1066 points, was in third place this round, with two featured articles and a good article, all on natural history topics.
 * Other contestants who qualified for the final round were 🇲🇭 Nova Crystallis, Iazyges,  SounderBruce,  🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Kosack and 🇺🇸 Ceranthor.

During round four, 6 featured articles and 164 good articles were promoted by WikiCup contestants, 13 articles were included in good topics and 143 good article reviews were performed. There were also 10 "in the news" contributions on the main page and 53 "did you knows". Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best editor win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 24
The article Washington State Route 24 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Washington State Route 24 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Truflip99 (talk) 01:13, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Interstate 82, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Condemnation ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Interstate_82 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Interstate_82?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Washington State Route 821
Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Date link
I'd provisionally scheduled Edmonds station (Washington) as TFA for 23 October because it fitted with my other scheduling in terms of content, but I see that it's listed at WP:TFAPR for December (not a month I'm scheduling). Just asking if you wish to stick with the December request or whether I can run it next month Jimfbleak - talk to me?  05:42, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I'd rather have this one run on the December date (which marks the 15th anniversary of its commuter rail service).  Sounder Bruce  05:57, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks for prompt reply, I'll find something else. Obviously I can't guarantee that it will run on your preferred date since it's not my pick, but it's likely since you've posted the request at TFAPR Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:00, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Number of Buildings over 400 feet in Seattle
You undid my edit citing the source. If you go on to Emporis, there are at least 39 completed buildings in Seattle of 400 feet.

DYK for U.S. Bicycle Route 66
Vanamonde (talk) 00:02, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Apple Capital Recreation Loop Trail
Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Interstate 5 in Washington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chehalis River ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Interstate_5_in_Washington check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Interstate_5_in_Washington?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hop Fastpass logo.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Hop Fastpass logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited U.S. Route 395 in Washington, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sprague Lake and Fairwood, Washington ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/U.S._Route_395_in_Washington check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/U.S._Route_395_in_Washington?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Wish
Hello. Help improve the quality of the article Maureen Wroblewitz on Did you know? articles. Thanks you. 113.160.130.156 (talk) 10:01, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
HI, I noticed you restored template:cleanup-PR on Hop Fastpass. I read through the policies listed and none seemed to apply, is there anything in particular you would like me to take a look at? On holiday dmartin969  04:31, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * The IP and Shadowoneone seem to have added a lot of spammy passages, along with poor English. The article needs to be scrubbed from top to bottom.  Sounder Bruce  04:35, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Comment
Hi! You removed text related to notable people who lived on Kalanianaole Hwy - Hawaii Route 72 here: but I have seen other Road / Street / Route articles that do have a section for "Notable Residents" such as Crick Road. Why would President Obama having lived on that street be considered trivia? Thanks. --the eloquent peasant (talk) 01:37, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * A 700-foot-long road is different from a 18-mile highway/freeway that serves a major metropolitan area. Listing all the residents who have lived along or near a given highway would be unnecessary bloat (as covered under WP:TRIVIA) and, unless they have a particularly strong connection to the road, is just not interesting. Under the project standards for road articles, trivia should be integrated cleanly into the route description or history section, something that could be done with enough secondary sourcing to join the highway with Obama's early years.  Sounder Bruce  04:05, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay. Thanks. --the eloquent peasant (talk) 10:19, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Interstate 90 in Idaho, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coeur d'Alene ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Interstate_90_in_Idaho check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Interstate_90_in_Idaho?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Washington State Route 24
Hi, there's a reference tag on footnote 31; could you clear that up please? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 17:49, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * It's an error caused by the pre-formatted template (inflation-fn) and seems to be a global issue.  Sounder Bruce  21:34, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * OK. I noted that at ERRORS2. Yoninah (talk) 21:54, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Washington State Route 24
Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk page order
So, totally not a big deal, but just FYI (per Talk_page_layout), the talk page header is usually above the article history template. Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 02:46, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I should also acknowledge, you were right to revert this edit because active nominations are placed at the top of the talk page. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 02:49, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Whoops. I was just going off what I've seen on other pages, which I assumed was the standard. I do prefer the look of GA/FA box > projects > talk page boxes, but that might just be because I'm so used to it.  Sounder Bruce  02:50, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Funny how that works, I'm so used to seeing talk page header on top. I'm glad this conversation had me revisit the talk page order documentation -- been a while! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 02:57, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Washington State Route 99, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fremont Bridge ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Washington_State_Route_99 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Washington_State_Route_99?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Talkback
Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:15, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Edmonds, Washington
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Edmonds, Washington you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 07:01, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Edmonds, Washington
The article Edmonds, Washington you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Edmonds, Washington for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 08:40, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Issaquah Highlands
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Issaquah Highlands you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 10:00, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Issaquah Highlands
The article Issaquah Highlands you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Issaquah Highlands for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 11:20, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Edmonds, Washington
The article Edmonds, Washington you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Edmonds, Washington for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 18:41, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Issaquah Highlands
The article Issaquah Highlands you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Issaquah Highlands for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 18:41, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

MV Kitsap
I see no grounds for considering the current ferry as the primary topic, perhaps you could explain why you do? I would also direct your attention to WP:SHIPDAB. Lyndaship (talk) 07:32, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Considering that it's currently being used by commuters, there's a good chance it qualifies as the primary topic here.  Sounder Bruce  07:40, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * On that basis of current use every current UK warship and many US warships would not be dabbed see USS George Washington (CVN-73) for just one example that they are. Your viewpoint is specifically countered by WP:PRIMARYTOPIC Perhaps the most commonly rejected criterion is that the primary topic should only belong to what "first comes to mind".  Puget Sound commuters knowledge of one ship is not sufficient reason to vary Wikipedias conventions Lyndaship (talk) 08:17, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * One ship sank a half-century ago and was forgotten, while another continues to be used and referenced in local media. It's a little hard to do a search result comparison, as "Kitsap" is also the name of a county with several ferry routes, but it's pretty easy to see why almost no one would call the 1925 ship the primary topic here.  Sounder Bruce  03:12, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The correct primary topic would be a ship index page titled MV Kitsap. Lyndaship (talk) 14:38, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Captions
WP:CAP says that captions must be consise free of obvious details; saying the entire name of the building is pointless, when it was taken adds nothing as buildings do not changes and where it was taken is useless. Similar to in Met Life Building, captions aren’t normally needed in the lead image for a building.  IWI  ( chat ) 12:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 546
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Washington State Route 546 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Chrysalia -- Nova Chrysalia (talk) 13:40, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 546
The article Washington State Route 546 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Washington State Route 546 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Chrysalia -- Nova Chrysalia (talk) 15:02, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 204
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Washington State Route 204 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 20:01, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 515
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Washington State Route 515 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 20:21, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 515
The article Washington State Route 515 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Washington State Route 515 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 20:41, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 204
The article Washington State Route 204 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Washington State Route 204 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 00:41, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 241
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Washington State Route 241 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 15:01, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of U.S. Route 97 Alternate (Washington)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article U.S. Route 97 Alternate (Washington) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 15:21, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 241
The article Washington State Route 241 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Washington State Route 241 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 15:22, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of U.S. Route 97 Alternate (Washington)
The article U.S. Route 97 Alternate (Washington) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:U.S. Route 97 Alternate (Washington) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 15:40, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

please look at this photo in regards to your revert on Philip F. Anschutz Trophy
who's name is on this trophy ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.127.12.62 (talk) 01:01, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of U.S. Route 97 Alternate
The article U.S. Route 97 Alternate you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:U.S. Route 97 Alternate for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Example -- Example (talk) 13:01, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of U.S. Route 97 Alternate (Washington)
The article U.S. Route 97 Alternate (Washington) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:U.S. Route 97 Alternate (Washington) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 13:02, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
 * SB, can you fix the KML error, preferably before the DYK hits the Main Page? M AN d ARAX  •  XAЯA b ИA M  17:58, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
 * It's been fixed. The KML subpage was not moved when moved the article and talk page.  Sounder  Bruce  03:30, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * For the record, I passed this article, and have no idea why you got a "failed" template from the bot. Courcelles (talk) 14:27, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 504
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Washington State Route 504 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 15:01, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 243
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Washington State Route 243 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 15:01, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 504
The article Washington State Route 504 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Washington State Route 504 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 15:20, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 281
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Washington State Route 281 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 15:21, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 243
The article Washington State Route 243 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Washington State Route 243 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 15:21, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 281
The article Washington State Route 281 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Washington State Route 281 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 15:41, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 281
The article Washington State Route 281 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Washington State Route 281 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 17:21, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 504
The article Washington State Route 504 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Washington State Route 504 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 17:42, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 823
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Washington State Route 823 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 13:40, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 243
The article Washington State Route 243 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Washington State Route 243 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 13:41, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 823
The article Washington State Route 823 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Washington State Route 823 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 14:01, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 823
The article Washington State Route 823 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Washington State Route 823 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 18:02, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Washington State Route 243
Hello! Your submission of Washington State Route 243 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Kosack (talk) 09:17, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

DYK for U.S. Route 97 Alternate
Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 28
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Washington State Route 28 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 20:40, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 28
The article Washington State Route 28 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Washington State Route 28 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 21:20, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

"Drive-by copyedits"
Did you notice ? ☆ Bri (talk) 01:44, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I did, but frankly this copyeditor and a few others at GOCE aren't up to the task—especially when it comes to articles being prepared for a run at FAC.  Sounder Bruce  01:48, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I took a quick run at it but most of what I found were MOS fixes (particularly hyphenating compound modifiers, including with convert templates). I italicized the names of the tunnelling machines, following the convention with ships and named spacecraft and railroad locomotives.  What may be of more help is that I've placed the request at its original request date at WP:GOCER so it's at the top of the list and shouldn't wait long for a copy editor who does more FA-level work. Sorry for any inconvenience. – Reidgreg (talk) 16:21, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comb-through, but I'll have to undo a few of them—mainly the hyphened form of "light rail". In official and informal uses locally, it is not hyphenated; most of the hyphenated that were added to the article are pretty unnecessary and aren't exactly preached by MOS.  Sounder Bruce  16:26, 30 October 2018 (UTC)


 * WP:VOLUNTEER. Why, then, do you bother requesting copyedits? You should have raised any issues with the copyeditor; after reading the above, I wouldn't accept a request from you.  Mini  apolis  15:03, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Just because this is a volunteer-run effort, it doesn't have to be done quickly and sloppily for meaningless internet points (or in this case, points that are redeemed for a barnstar). GOCE is normally good at catching typos, grammar issues, and other small things that get overlooked in the GAN process, but the copyeditor in question completely ignored MOS and normal conventions to add their own bias towards hyphened phrases into the article. That is something I absolutely cannot stand and would hope gets corrected.  Sounder Bruce  03:50, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Just sayin'. If you want your articles to be promoted, it's prudent to not antagonize the editors who help you get there.  Mini  apolis  22:57, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Washington State Route 28
The article Washington State Route 28 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Washington State Route 28 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 04:21, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interstate 82
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Interstate 82 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Crystallis -- Nova Crystallis (talk) 01:40, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interstate 82
The article Interstate 82 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Interstate 82 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nova Crystallis -- Nova Crystallis (talk) 02:02, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Capitol Hill Station
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Capitol Hill station has been completed.

In the "Background and planning" section, in the last paragraph, there are wikilinks around the name Husky Stadium station. This link actually takes the reader to University of Washington station. Perhaps it is known informally as "Husky Stadium station", but apart from a mention that the U of W station is adjacent to the stadium, there is no indication it is called this. I'll leave that to you to resolve.

Please let me know if there are any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the FA review.

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:10, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to join discussion on Affordable Housing
Hi, if you have the time, I would like to find some people interested in cities and doing something about the Affordable housing page. I put a proposal up on the Talk page to split it and am looking for input. Thanks!

Seahawk01 (talk) 03:09, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gritty (mascot), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antifa ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Gritty_%28mascot%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Gritty_%28mascot%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 2 November 2018 (UTC)