User talk:SounderBruce/Archive 42

Wikipedia_Signpost/Next_issue/Featured_content
I'm pretty sure you won't mind, or I wouldn't have written it, but can you review the poem for List of Seattle Sounders FC seasons? Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600th FP! 08:19, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * It's good, though I would rather have one focused on the team rather than my own achievements.  Sounder Bruce  16:44, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I'll see what I can do. Never quite sure what to grab onto for sports teams, as the things people like about sports tend to be at the fine grained level (the moment-to-moment of play), not a decades-spanning overview. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.3% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600th FP! 17:46, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2019 MLS Cup Playoff Bracket
Template:2019 MLS Cup Playoff Bracket has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 14:30, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Draft:2023 Portland Thorns FC season
Hey, Bruce! I stumbled upon Draft:2023 Portland Thorns FC season and figured you might be able to assess whether or not the page belongs in the main space. No worries if you're not interested. Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:45, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Did some light cleaning and moved it to the mainspace. It will need to be watched for POV issues in the future, though.  Sounder Bruce  00:26, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:28, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 May newsletter
The second round of the 2023 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to have scored 60 points to advance into round 3. Our top five scorers in round 2 all included a featured article among their submissions and each scored over 500 points. They were:


 * Iazyges (1040) with three FAs on Byzantine emperors, and lots of bonus points.
 * Unlimitedlead (847), with three FAs on ancient history, one GA and nine reviews.
 * Epicgenius (636), a WikiCup veteran, with one FA on the New Amsterdam Theatre, four GAs and eleven DYKs
 * BennyOnTheLoose (553), a seasoned competitor, with one FA on snooker, six GAs and seven reviews.
 * 🇩🇪 FrB.TG (525), with one FA, a Lady Gaga song and a mass of bonus points.

Other notable performances were put in by Sammi Brie,  Thebiguglyalien,  MyCatIsAChonk,  PCN02WPS, and  AirshipJungleman29.

So far contestants have achieved thirteen featured articles between them, one being a joint effort, and forty-nine good articles. The judges are pleased with the thorough reviews that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interstate 95 in New Hampshire
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Interstate 95 in New Hampshire you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bneu2013 -- Bneu2013 (talk) 06:22, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interstate 95 in New Hampshire
The article Interstate 95 in New Hampshire you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Interstate 95 in New Hampshire for comments about the article, and Talk:Interstate 95 in New Hampshire/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bneu2013 -- Bneu2013 (talk) 20:41, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

San Diego MLS team
I noticed you reverted my edit right when I noticed it was a duplicate and already in the article. My bad!  conman33  (. . .talk)  23:32, 18 May 2023 (UTC)


 * FWIW, I think the Loyal stuff is in the wrong section of the San Diego MLS team article – the section is in 'Previous MLS bids'. Loyal is not "MLS" – it's Division 2. So it doesn't belong there. I would recommend moving that entire paragraph to the 'Soccer in San Diego' section where it more clearly belongs. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

About your DYK nom for the 2023 CONCACAF Champions League final
Hello! I just wanted to tell you I started reviewing your DYK nomination recently: I actually tagged you in my reply, but I'm afraid it didn't work as planned...

Oltrepier (talk) 16:46, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

DYK for San Diego MLS team
Aoidh (talk) 00:03, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Huntsville City FC Help
Hi I started up a 2023 Huntsville City FC Season page. I was wondering if you could help me out? Here is the link to the page. 2023 Huntsville City FC season Logan Z Man 2022! (talk) 01:46, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I went ahead and cleaned up some of the work. Please make sure to include citations to reliable sources, preferably those not published by the league or teams; I suggest looking at local newspapers in particular or national sports publications like Sports Illustrated or ''Soccer America.  Sounder Bruce  02:47, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Spokane Transit Authority logo.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Spokane Transit Authority logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Capitalization reverts
SB, I see a bunch of reverts, but I don't see clearly which changes you are objecting to, or why. Please elaborate. Dicklyon (talk) 02:03, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Your script has a ton of errors and the changes need to be discussed in an RfC. They're not necessary and run contrary to the expectations of sports WikiProjects.  Sounder Bruce  02:07, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm using patterns not scripts. Which changes do you say are errors? What question would you ask at an RFC?  Dicklyon (talk) 02:30, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

TFL notification
Hi, SounderBruce. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Interstate Highways in Washington – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for June 30. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008  ( Talk ) 21:39, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
 * All right, it's sorted. Again, sorry for any inconvenience. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 21:32, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

WP:CTOP alert
You have recently made edits related to the English Wikipedia article titles policy and Manual of Style. This is a standard message to inform you that the English Wikipedia article titles policy and Manual of Style is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Contentious topics. Cinderella157 (talk) 08:24, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Link light rail
Hello.

Can you create a route map for Link light rail in Wikimedia Commons, that includes both lines 1 and 2, both in service and under construction (which can be later updated)? Every Wikipedia article about an individual public transport, has a route map, when they exist in Wikimedia Commons. You created a nice route map for Line 2.

Yours sincerely, Multituberculata (talk) 05:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I am working on an interactive map, since the changing nature of the system makes it difficult to use static maps. the problem is that Line 2 is not open and it is unknown whether it will be divided (the "starter line" proposal) or a single line, and Line T is off in the distance and would need to be an inset. Until this is done, please do not add more images; there are sandwiching issues created by the density of images, and the pictures of trains and stations are more important to convey what the system's characteristics are.  Sounder Bruce  05:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. The long map of Line 1, indeed takes up too much space. Let's wait and see when Line 2 is opened to service, this year or the next year. Multituberculata (talk) 05:37, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry didn't see this first. But there really needs to be actual maps in the article until there's an interactive map. I do not buy the clutter argument, and the diagram (Template:Link light rail) is not an appropriate substitute. It's perfectly fine to include line maps in the system article, especially because the operating lines are not connected! Reywas92Talk 13:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Or File:Link light rail, route map.png can be put in the infobox. The Infrastructure section currently has no images so a train picture there could easily be moved there and not cause sandwiching. Reywas92Talk 13:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Pedestrian crossings in Seattle
Hey, Bruce! Thanks for the correcting the lead at Pedestrian crossings in Seattle. I welcome your improvements throughout the entry. I've approached this article from an artistic/paint perspective, but I'm sure there's much more to say about local crossings. Perhaps content related to agencies, funding, regulations, lights, signage, audio commands for visually impaired people, reflective markings, etc. This sort of stuff is outside my comfort zone. I'd appreciate your contributions from more of a transit perspective, if you ever have time and interest. Either way, happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Since regulations and most features are standardized nationally under the MUTCD, that level of detail shouldn't be necessary. I'll try to dig up some information on when some accessible features were implemented once I'm back from my road trip.  Sounder Bruce  03:48, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Flag of Provo, Utah (2015).png
Thanks for uploading File:Flag of Provo, Utah (2015).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

American Football House DYK
Hey! It's been a couple weeks since my last message there, but I was wondering if you could take a look at my changes over at Template:Did you know nominations/American Football House. Your review is greatly appreciated! BanjoZebra (talk) 15:49, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

DYK for 2023 CONCACAF Champions League final
RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Timberland Regional Library logo.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Timberland Regional Library logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Charlotte FC
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Charlotte FC you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cherrell410 -- Cherrell410 (talk) 13:22, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Charlotte FC
The article Charlotte FC you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Charlotte FC and Talk:Charlotte FC/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cherrell410 -- Cherrell410 (talk) 02:42, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Charlotte FC
The article Charlotte FC you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Charlotte FC for comments about the article, and Talk:Charlotte FC/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cherrell410 -- Cherrell410 (talk) 15:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 July newsletter
The third round of the 2023 WikiCup has come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 175 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:


 * Thebiguglyalien, with 919 points from a featured article on Frances Cleveland as well as five good articles and many reviews,
 * Unlimitedlead, with 862 points from a high-scoring featured articles on Henry II of England and numerous reviews,
 * Iazyges, with 560 points from a high-scoring featured article on Tiberius III.

Contestants achieved 11 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 47 good articles, 72 featured or good article reviews, over 100 DYKs and 40 ITN appearances. As always, any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:18, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Disruptive edits
I've seen 3 reversions in MLS cup articles, alleging "per IMAGELAYOUT". Before undoing your reversions (which I consider unappropriate), I must clear that I put the stadium pictures at left so they were out of the paragraph referenced, mostly visible on MLS Cup 1997.

As far as I know, a left aligment should be justified in cases like that. If you have a better argument I'm will to know, otherwise I'll make the changes again. And please, don't make of this an edit war because there is no need of that. It can be discussed on the talk page if you prefer. Fma12 (talk) 09:48, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
 * A left alignment of that image disrupts the layout by pushing the section heading "Road to the final" into the middle of the article. This is discussed in the second sentence at MOS:IMAGELOC. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:15, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

DYK for 2023 CONCACAF Nations League final
Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Seattle Wiknic 2023
01:02, 19 July 2023 (UTC) To unsubscribe from future messages from Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list.

WP:CITESTYLE vs. MOS:DATE
Thanks for the heads-up. Looking at my watchlist, many of your script-assisted changes were to dates in citations. WP:CITESTYLE and WP:CS1 explicitly seems to allow any date format, and indeed several of my citations using YYYY-MM-DD formatted dates are also generated by the editor or other recommended tools; am I misreading that about citation date formats? It's also unclear to me when "strong ties" do or don't apply, especially w/r/t footballers (cf. me in Talk:Sinead Farrelly). Any guidance is appreciated. -Socccc (talk) 21:52, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Citation dates must be done in a consistent format. I'm usually cleaning up stray uses of DMY and YMD formats in articles that largely use MDY already in the majority of citations.  Sounder Bruce  22:01, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks! That makes sense. I'll try to keep an eye on consistency going forward. Do you know of any further guidance on how "strong ties" are defined on footballer articles? More-experienced editors seem to have hard-and-fast rules on it that I can't suss out, and I couldn't find anything in WP:WikiProject Football on it. -Socccc (talk) 22:05, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Invitation
Hello ! Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
 * The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
 * We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
 * Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
 * Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
 * If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Sent by using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hi SounderBruce. Your account has been added to the " " user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:
 * Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging  pages for  maintenance so  that  they are aware.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
 * If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 21:31, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Piping MLS team names
I think we need to have a discussion about how MLS team names are piped. I've been working for CBS Sports Golazo Network for almost the last four months and we never refer to Inter Miami as "Inter Miami CF". Same goes for Seattle Sounders, Vancouver Whitecaps, St Louis City, Chicago Fire, Minnesota United, Houston Dynamo, Orlando City and Atlanta United. I think the key is that in all those cases, the name includes another word as well as the name of the city. That's why we use "Austin FC", "Toronto FC", "New York City FC", "CF Montréal", "FC Dallas", "Charlotte FC", "FC Cincinnati" and "Nashville SC". It may seem inconsistent, but there is an underlying logic to it. – PeeJay 09:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't think it needs to be rehashed. Keeping things consistent is better than trying to decide who can or cannot have a piped name; the case of St. Louis City SC would be one that would spark pointless debate, since one could argue that they are akin to New York City FC.  Sounder Bruce  09:32, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Not really, since the city isn't commonly known as "St Louis City". Again, we should use the names that are common in sources, and those are the ones I've listed above. – PeeJay 10:10, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Cleveland
Hi there. I see you have also edited Cleveland. I'm in a bit of a content dispute there (I think I'm right, but maybe not??) Would you mind having a look at the edit history? Thanks! Magnolia677 (talk) 22:50, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Interstate 90
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 12 September 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Today's featured article/September 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/September 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 21:05, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

FA opinion
Hello, I would like to try one more time to get Interstate 40 in Tennessee to featured articles status. On the last nomination, there seemed to be a consensus that it was close, but unfortunately it struggled to attract reviewers. I have made a few improvements since then. Since you have a good bit of experience with getting US road articles to FA, I was wondering, would you support promoting this article to FA in its current form if I were to nominate it now? Thanks. Bneu2013 (talk) 06:43, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I won't be able to review the FAC due to my limited free time and having my own work to finish up before the season is over. From a quick look, all I can say that it is far too long and will be shot down again at FAC in its current state. It might be best to split or fork content in some areas and leave behind much shorter summaries rather than trying to achieve full coverage.  Sounder Bruce  20:50, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
 * With all due respect, no one outright opposed because of the length, although they suggested I trim the route description, why I have done and am working on further. But, as I pointed out to other editors, this is an article about not only the second-longest Interstate Highway segment east of the Mississippi River (455 miles), but one which passes through three metropolitan areas with populations greater than one million, and as a result has far more post-construction history than stretches of similar length, such as Interstate 25 in New Mexico or Interstate 80 in Nebraska. Add it's connection to a landmark Supreme Court case and the Music Highway designation, and the highway becomes arguably one of the more important sections from a historical standpoint. All of the sections are at summary length, with no more than four paragraphs, and the total word count is approximately 9.5k, which is slightly lower than the max recommended by WP:SS. I will also point out that the route description length per mile is actually less than some other highway FAs, like Interstate 82 and Kansas Turnpike. I actually feel like a hypocrite trying to justify the length as I have been the one to tell other users not to include stuff on more than one occasion. Bneu2013 (talk) 00:33, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I thought I might let you know that I've renominated. Since I first asked you about this the article has received a GOCE copyedit that cut about 700 words, although I did add a little bit of information about honorary designations. But the article is still a good bit shorter than it was before the copyedit. Bneu2013 (talk) 00:18, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2020 Seattle Sounders FC season
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2020 Seattle Sounders FC season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 00:04, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2020 Seattle Sounders FC season
The article 2020 Seattle Sounders FC season you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2020 Seattle Sounders FC season and Talk:2020 Seattle Sounders FC season/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 00:22, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Sourdough Fire
Hello! Your submission of Sourdough Fire at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Wasted Time R (talk) 10:49, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2020 Seattle Sounders FC season
The article 2020 Seattle Sounders FC season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2020 Seattle Sounders FC season for comments about the article, and Talk:2020 Seattle Sounders FC season/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:03, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Attached KML/Interstate 405 (Oregon) routing options
Template:Attached KML/Interstate 405 (Oregon) routing options has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:09, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, SounderBruce. Thank you for your work on Raft River Valley. User:Lightburst, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lightburst (talk) 17:07, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2023 CONCACAF Nations League final
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2023 CONCACAF Nations League final you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 11:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

US 395 inquiry to avoid edit warring
I just want to clarify something. The lead of US 395 is misleading because it makes its sound like it is totally disconnected from US 95. I know roads link the two routes, but I'm talking about in terms of the auxiliary route not connecting in anyway to its parent route both directly (US 95 intersecting US 395) or indirectly (US 395 intersecting another auxiliary route of US 95 that directly connects to US 95). This is not true since it has an indirect connection to US 95 via US 195. I wanted to note that (it is done with interstates and I've added indirect connections to other U.S. routes with no trouble), but it appears that you don't agree with me. Why is that when US 195 is the only connection between US 95 and US 395? Chess Eric  13:45, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Such a detail simply does not belong in the lead. It's also misleading to only list US 195 as the sole indirect connection, as dozens of other highways also run between the two; instead, the history section is where US 195's role can be stated clearly without causing confusion. Please respect BRD in the future, as edit wars can easily flare up when the procedure is not followed.  Sounder Bruce  22:31, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
 * That's why I came here to ask rather than continuing to just revert endlessly. Thanks for informing me on this. Chess  Eric  23:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
 * On a separate note, can you see the discussion that I just made on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads page? Chess  Eric  23:12, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

The 2026 World Cup talk page and soccer v. football
I am going to step back from further participation in the soccer v. football discussion on the 2026 World Cup page. I don't feel there's anything else to say and it's clear the user agitating on the issue is just repeating the same points and not considering other matters like WP:RETAIN. I also note said user has a total of three edits, all of them to that talk page, but I don't want to point that out over there lest I appear to be assuming bad faith. (It's more a case of being irritated about being lectured by someone who has a total of three edits.) Because I can feel myself getting irritated, I think it's better that I just refrain from further discussion there for the time being. 1995hoo (talk) 13:13, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Sourdough Fire
Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2023 CONCACAF Nations League final
The article 2023 CONCACAF Nations League final you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2023 CONCACAF Nations League final for comments about the article, and Talk:2023 CONCACAF Nations League final/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 11:01, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

The Center Line: Fall 2023
  Volume 10, Issue 1 • Fall 2023 • About the Newsletter • A New Future for Road Articles Online  Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
 * Features
 * —delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of  Imzadi 1979  →  on 19:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

interstate 90
SounderBruce, i had a quick question regarding this article and the associated blurb. i am having trouble confirming that there are 16 auxiliary routes. i am assuming that they are all enumerated in the list of bullet points under the "Auxiliary routes" section of the article, but i am only counting 15 routes. the cited fhwa source seems to only list 15 routes that begin with "I-" and end with "90". am i somehow counting the auxiliary routes incorrectly? dying (talk) 08:37, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
 * It was a typo, there are in fact only 15 auxiliary routes.  Sounder Bruce  08:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
 * ah, that explains it. thanks for addressing this issue!  dying (talk) 18:09, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you today for the article, introduced: "The longest freeway in the United States, and perhaps the world. Stretching from Seattle to Boston, one can drive on I-90 for over 3,000 miles from the Pacific to the Atlantic without having to stop for a traffic signal, only the occasional tollbooth."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Attached KML/Seattle Streetcar 2
Template:Attached KML/Seattle Streetcar 2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

DYK for 2020 Seattle Sounders FC season
Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

DYK for 2023 Leagues Cup final
RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

DYK for U.S. Bank Center (Seattle)
RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

2034 FIFA World Cup
I was on my way out of the door when I saw that edit. It looked like copy paste but I only had time for a quick check before popping out. I've just rev another editor for removing your request for rev/del so it might be worth keeping an eye on it. It's on my watchlist now. Knitsey (talk) 17:48, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were


 * Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
 * Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
 * Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.

Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)