User talk:Soundofthesea

April 2016
Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you made a change to an article, T. P. Lahane, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 20:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to T. P. Lahane. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Nyttend (talk) 11:45, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at T. P. Lahane, you may be blocked from editing. Nyttend (talk) 11:52, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Polite request
Hi. May I suggest your dispute with the dean is not a matter for us here on wikipedia. You will not be allowed to engage here, as it is not a matter for the project to solve. Thanks. -Roxy the dog of Doom™ woof 12:08, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Exactly so. You are evidently attempting to use Wikipedia to promote a point of view and publicise an issue on which you are campaigning. Doing so is contrary to Wikipedia policy, and you will be blocked from editing if you continue. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:12, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Edit-warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on T. P. Lahane. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:10, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

June 2016
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on User talk:Nyttend. Thank you. Muffled Pocketed  12:27, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * You are right master. I bow down to you. Forgive me. The dean is fired by the Govt. User:Soundofthesea

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it is clear that you are not here to contribute to building the encyclopedia. The ridiculous email you sent me removed any last vestige of reason to give you any more chances. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:30, 10 June 2016 (UTC)