User talk:Soupdragon42

3RR
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. --ScienceApologist 11:34, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

ScienceApologist has started an edit war in a flagrant attempt to push his own points of view and to censor and suppress new ideas. This user has also resorted to making false and unsubstantiated allegations. See the ludicrous sock puppet allegation above. Please watch this user.

He has removed a legitimate link to D.E. Scott's new Book, The Electric Sky, on a number of occasions now, and has failed to provide any reasonable basis for this edit warring. The book outlines the latest developments in Plasma Cosmology, and is endorsed by Anthony Perratt. Additionally, this book makes no claims in regard to catastrophism!

Explanation please
Why did you delete my statement at WP:RFAR? Raymond Arritt 15:38, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

No explanation is necessary
I am not aware of making any such edit, although my comments in the Ian Tresman ArbCom were persistently removed by unknown persons.

Furthermore, I am not a sockpuppet of Ian Tresman. Proof positive has been provided to senior admin, and yet the allegations are yet to be removed. This is a disgraceful state of affairs! A witchcraft trial no less.

Sockpuppet of Ian Tresman
I never accused you of being a sockpuppet of Ian Tresman. ScienceApologist 18:14, 22 October 2007 (UTC)


 * You have accused me of being a sockpuppet of numerous people, including NineDragons, who you also claimed was a sockpuppet for Ian Tresman.


 * I see you have now edited these accusations out of this page (top), and other places, but that you have made them in more general terms!

--Soupdragon42 17:50, 24 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Show the diff. Welcome to the discussion. It's nice to see the catastrophist society out to try to get their main champion unbanned. Enjoy reveling in your pseudoscience. ScienceApologist (talk) 15:04, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Iantresman (2nd nomination) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Jehochman Talk 15:36, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Take a timeout
Warning: You need to take a timeout for 24 hours. If you continue to edit today you will be subject to sanction for evading the block placed on your IP address for harassment. You also should avoid a repeat of March 26. Thatcher 15:44, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Block notice
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. As Checkuser, Requests for checkuser/Case/Iantresman, has now confirmed the use of sock puppet accounts for harassing other users, and for evading scrutiny of your edit history, I have blocked your account for two weeks. When you return, please use only one account, and please be WP:CIVIL to other editors. Jehochman Talk 16:41, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * We have been through all these sockpuppet allegations before. See here. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration&oldid=164377671#Statement_by_ScienceApologist_2
 * I cannot believe that ScienceAntagonist gets away with his continual insinuations and misrepresentations.

Here was my reason, which you edited out:
 * I cannot believe that ScienceAntagonist gets away with his continual insinuations and misrepresentations. SA has sent me abusive emails to dvd[at]plasmacosmology.net He knows that I am not Ian Tresman. I am based in West London (Check my IP) and www.plasmacosmology.net is my web site. It is based on the works of Kristian Birkeland, Irving Langmuir, and Hannes Alfven, and also those who continue their great pioneering works. Unfortunately, the emerging plasma paradigm threatens some of the entrenched thinking out there.
 * This info is also outlined in the link I provided above and has been passed onto numerous Wiki admin before
 * I have no idea how to use an unblock template. Apologies!

Here was my reason, which was edited out earlier:
 * I have sucessfully demonstrated that I am not a Socpuppet before now. Why do I have to go through all this again?
 * I cannot believe that ScienceAntagonist gets away with his continual insinuations and misrepresentations. SA has sent me abusive emails to dvd[at]plasmacosmology.net
 * He knows that I am not Ian Tresman. I am based in West London (Check my IP) and www.plasmacosmology.net is my web site. It is based on the works of Kristian Birkeland, Irving Langmuir, and Hannes Alfven, and also those who continue their great pioneering works. Unfortunately, the emerging plasma paradigm threatens some of the entrenched thinking out there.
 * This info is also outlined in the link I provided above and has been passed onto numerous Wiki admin before
 * Soupdragon42 (talk) 16:56, 12 April 2008 (UTC)}}.
 * Have a look at the diff. I didn't edit out any of your wording, so I don't particularly appreciate the insinuation - you put forward no reason in the unblock request. The unblock request explains how to do this - copy this bit of text and . GBT/C 17:06, 12 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I've reposted the unblock request for you, properly formatted. I'll leave it for another admin to review. GBT/C 17:08, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * If you look above at my block notice, there is a link to Requests for checkuser/Case/Iantresman that confirmed the use of IP for harassing another editor, and the use of a second named account for avoiding scrutiny. I welcome a review by any uninvolved administrator. Jehochman Talk 17:44, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
I have blocked your account for an undefined length of time. Inspection of your contributions reveals that you have repeatedly spammed www.plasmacosmology.net. Today you posted to ANI stating that this is your own website.  You were previously blocked for two weeks for sock puppetry and harassment. At that time you could have been blocked indefinitely. Further inspection of your contributions reveals that none of them have substantial encyclopedic value. They consist of attempts to promote your own site, or to fight with those who oppose you. Should you wish to edit again, you should post an unblock request stating that you will stop repeatedly adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It may also help if you identify subjects to which you would like to add encyclopedic content, and state that you will not fight with other editors. I hope this helps. Jehochman Talk 21:03, 29 October 2008 (UTC)