User talk:Source-of-inspiration

Please stop posting on my talk page
I am entitled to delete or archive your comments on my talk page – please read WP:BLANKING for an overview of what users may and may not add or delete from their own pages.

I will engage with you on the deletion discussion if you have any specific points to make there. You have not made a single specific point with academic evidence; you display zero signs of academia, research or respect. You ought to be ashamed of yourself for attempting to delete that page. You said, "I will be happy to be proven wrong." Why should the author of the page in question be situated to prove himself right? What evidence have you provided to prove yourself? I see zero evidence. Source-of-inspiration (talk) 19:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

You are no longer welcome to post on my talk page, as, frankly, your style of communication is bordering on the hostile, but you may WP:PING me if you have something you specifically want me to respond to elsewhere. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 19:09, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Bordering on hostile? There is nothing more hostile than deleting a page of an innocent celebrity; especially with zero scholarly evidence. Source-of-inspiration (talk) 19:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Since you deleted it form your page, I will post it here:

You intentionally deleted my attempt to communicate so I am posting this again (2nd time this has been deleted).

You are suggesting that the page for Srila Bhaktivedanta Narayana Gosvami be deleted yet it appears you have not executed any of the considerations before nominating an article for deletion as cited here under **Deletion Process**.

For your convenience I am citing a few of the points here. Note that ALL of the steps should be considered:


 * Investigate the possibility of rewriting the article yourself (or at least creating a stub on the topic and requesting expansion) instead of deleting it.
 * First do the necessary homework and look for sources yourself, and invite discussion on the talk page by using the notability template, if you are disputing the notability of an article's subject. The fact that you haven't heard of something, or don't personally consider it worthy, are not criteria for deletion. You must look for, and demonstrate that you couldn't find, any independent sources of sufficient depth.

To repeat, it clearly states in the process for deletion:

The fact that you haven't heard of something, or don't personally consider it worthy, are not criteria for deletion. You must look for, and demonstrate that you couldn't find, any independent sources of sufficient depth.

Unless you have scholarly evidence to support your suggestion for deletion, you are violating Wikipedia's deletion process.

Source-of-inspiration (talk) 19:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)