User talk:South Nashua/Archive 3

Do Not Delete St. Mary's Church, Gulmarg
Do not Delete the article, article has reliable and enough source on google. I am putting the citations for it and even looking for some more material for this article. It is an important monument in Jammu and Kashmir belonging to christianity. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeromeenriquez (talk • contribs) 21:19, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

MfD Opinion
Hi there South Nashua, I was wondering if I could possibly get your opinion on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Soorebia? If not that's fine.

Thank you for your time.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 23:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Sure! Lemme look. South Nashua (talk) 23:09, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for you feedback! For some reason I wasn't notified despite the ping. Hmm.... --TheSandDoctor (talk) 23:14, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I think it was my fault, I did talkback instead of a ping. South Nashua (talk) 23:20, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * You did use ping before. Weird. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 02:53, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

MfD opinion on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Rishi Aurobindo Mission School
Hi again Sourth Nashua, I was wondering if I could I please get your thoughts on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Rishi Aurobindo Mission School? Thanks! --TheSandDoctor (talk) 00:01, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Withdrew MfD nomination and nominated for G11 instead. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 00:52, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

MfD opinion on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Syntactic noise
Hi again! I was just wondering if I could get your opinion on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Syntactic noise. Thanks! --TheSandDoctor (talk) 00:37, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Discussion closed. Primefac (talk) 01:02, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Sharon Lin
Hi there. Just a note on your tagging of Sharon Lin: Remember that for speedy deletion to be applied, all versions of a page have to meet the criteria. In this case, an anonymous user had removed almost all content before your review. I have thus restored the previous version which contains plenty of claims of significance/importance. In future, please check an article's history before tagging the page to avoid playing into the hands of such vandals. Regards  So Why  17:33, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Whoops. Sorry about that. South Nashua (talk) 00:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Hon. Matthew Opoku Prempeh
Your removal of the BLP prod from this article was improper and I have reinstated the BLP prod. For the BLP prod, it is completely irrelevant whether the subject is notable (e.g. whether he passes WP:NPOL). The only thing that matters is whether the article contains at least one reference to an independent reliable source. Please do not remove the BLP prod tag from the article unless and until you (or someone else) have addded such a reference to the article. Please see WP:BLPPROD for more information. Thanks, Nsk92 (talk) 19:29, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello. Your assertion that a reference was not placed in that edit was incorrect, per the edit summary. I've updated the article with multiple references superior to the initial one I placed and removed the tag, per WP:BLPPROD. Thank you. South Nashua (talk) 04:24, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Err, what do you mean? Here is a link to what the article looked like after your edit that I have mentioned (at 17:04, 12 May 2017). There were no references in that version of the article. Nsk92 (talk) 07:59, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Scratch that, I guess you were right. I swore I put something in there. Sorry about that. South Nashua (talk) 11:29, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Now I wonder where I DID put that link....Oh well, I guess it worked out in the end.South Nashua (talk) 11:31, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Articles
How do you create your own artciles? Matt Campbell (talk) 19:24, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * read this. South Nashua (talk) 00:15, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Berkeley school of political theory
Hi, South Nashua. Thanks for your edits on Berkeley school of political theory. I have removed the merge tag you added, because I suspect it was a misunderstanding -- the Berkeley school of political theory is a school of thought, named after faculty at UC Berkeley; it's not actually part of UC Berkeley. (That's why it's not capitalized.) See for example the Chicago school of economics. It's just a convention to name such things after the first and most influential faculty in the movement. If you want to discuss further, let's talk at Talk:Berkeley school of political theory. --Lquilter (talk) 18:11, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks! My mistake, I was unaware of that given what I saw there. It might make sense to talk more about it there later just in case, but for now, I appreciate you reaching out to me with the update. South Nashua (talk) 18:14, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Jorge Guillermo Borges Haslam
Hello South Nashua, I believe that I have addressed some of the issues that you pointed at when posting a notability template on this article. Would you kindly review the changes and eventually remove the message. Thanks. Herbert Ashe (talk) 20:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks! It's clear you put in a lot of hard work there. I think it's okay now, and even if others think it isn't, the fact that there was so much more information out there proves that it can still continue to improve. Good work, I removed the tag. South Nashua (talk) 21:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

I understand that my username has been deleted but must my personal page then be defaced and deleted too?
I am new to wiki editing. Made my first entries by adding some book reviews of various authors and recieved a thank you for the entries from you. Most of these reviews were published in various places but it was easier just to link them to those entries on my website. Obviously I now know this was a violation of the "conflict of interest" provision, and I admit that I didn't read all the wiki editing rules you attached in your previous correpondance.

I was asked to "Please stop adding links to reasonandmeaning.com, for which it appears that you have a conflict of interest. Please see WP:LINKSPAM.Edwardx (talk) 18:11, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

I immediately did so, apologize for not understanding that my own book reviews weren't proper material, and can't make any wiki entries of any kind in the future since my username "Johnmesserly" has also now been deleted.

I assume that my own page is now being considered for deletion as retailiation for my misconduct, which was the result of ignorance without malicious content. That seems harsh, as my entry was based carefully on those in similar roles as scholars of the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies, The Evolution, Cognition and Complexity group here in Brussels, etc. Is there any way my own entry can be restored?

Thank you for your consideration, I apologize for my ignorance of the system, and I also want you to know that I am a firm believer in Wikimedia's mission in this world of alternative facts and fake news.

Sincerely yours, Dr. John G Messerly Ph.D Affiliate Scholar of the Institute for Ethics & Emerging Technologies Affiliate of the Evolution, Complexity,and Cognition Group (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) Adjunct Professor, Department of Philosophy, Seattle University — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnmesserly (talk • contribs) 17:08, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi John, articles need to meet notability standards or they might be deleted. Please see WP:N for more details. Thanks! South Nashua (talk) 22:07, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Rohan Rangarajan (2nd nomination)
Hello. Your AfD nomination here was done in error because the subject definitely meets the notability criteria. Would you please read the points added to the discussion in the last two days and think about whether you wish to pursue the AfD. Although I have no doubt that you are acting in good faith, there have been instances of this type of nomination (by other persons) which have been labelled disruptive, so this is a heads-up. You need to be aware of the recent RfC result on GNG/SSC criteria (see the AfD for details). Thanks. Jack &#124; talk page 14:13, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, I don't think "acting in error" is accurate. It didn't meet the criteria when I nominated, but it seems to now that some additional information has been discovered putting it above notability thresholds. I'll withdraw my nom/change my viewpoint to keep now that notability has been established. South Nashua (talk) 20:18, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much. The guy played in the two games that qualify him at the end of May. When the original AfD took place in March, he was unqualified at that time. Regards, Jack &#124; talk page 20:28, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem. It was probably fine when I nominated it, but that wasn't entirely clear from the way it looked prior to Raju's improvements. Kind of amazing seeing everybody getting so worked up in the AFD. Doesn't seem like a big deal.South Nashua (talk) 20:32, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

PROF
Just as an FYI, being the president of Davidson College is a clear pass of WP:PROF. They are a nationally ranked liberal arts college in the United States and are pretty prominent regionally. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:31, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Whoops, sorry about that. You're absolutely right. South Nashua (talk) 23:14, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: ISAF Team Racing World Championship
Hello South Nashua. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of ISAF Team Racing World Championship, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: check the history before tagging, someone removed most of the content. Thank you.  So Why  14:12, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Whoops, sorry about that. Thanks for the heads up. South Nashua (talk) 02:28, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

CSD Log Question
I was curious, what is a "CSD Log"? I saw a reference to this the other day, don't remember where, but it didn't explain what it was. I know about CSD, but didn't realize there was a corresponding log you needed to keep up. South Nashua (talk) 14:22, 24 August 2017 (UTC)}}
 * A CSD log is a list of pages that you have tagged as requiring speedy deletion. If using Twinkle there is an option to generate this log automatically. There is no requirement for it to be done however some editors like to keep track of their tagging. Amortias (T)(C) 15:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Thank you

Ebin R Ebenezer (talk) 03:23, 30 August 2017 (UTC) 