User talk:Southpaws03

Speedy deletion of Single2Soulmate
A tag has been placed on Single2Soulmate requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:12, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Final warning before block
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 07:32, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 07:37, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Why was it blocked? I wasn't spamming anyone. I was simply creating the page so it could be added to wikipedia's list of social networks. Why are all those networks allowed to be listed and have pages on wikipedia but mine can't? Most of the ones listed there no one has even heard of, so what makes mine any different?

That makes no sense!

Southpaws03 (talk) 07:41, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * You were warned not to recreate the article (which was recreated three times); you chose to ignore warnings; you were blocked. Wikipedia is not an advertising medium for the non-notable dating site you just created. OhNo itsJamie Talk 07:42, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't notice any warnings. It wasn't intentional. What's wrong with the article though? There's nothing inappropriate about it, it's the same as any other social network page... Why should it have been deleted at all in the first place?

Southpaws03 (talk) 07:48, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * During your block, I suggest that you take the time to read the warnings placed on this page, which answer your question. OhNo itsJamie Talk 07:51, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

I already read them, thanks. They don't make sense because you claim I'm spamming, which I am not. You are not very helpful and I'm actually quite offended.

Southpaws03 (talk) 08:03, 30 September 2008 (UTC)


 * If you recreate the page or add links to the page when you're block expires, you will be blocked indefinitely and the site will be blacklisted. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:56, 30 September 2008 (UTC)