User talk:Souzaj

Welcome!

 * }

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Maternal near miss has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://jpdsouza.blogspot.com/. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:44, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Obstetric Transition.pdf


A tag has been placed on File:Obstetric Transition.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:42, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Obstetric transition.pptx.pdf listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Obstetric transition.pptx.pdf, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:42, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Obstetric transition
Hello Souzaj, It looks like the article that you created, Obstetric transition, is a cut and paste excerpt from your journal article. There are many footnotes throughout without accompanying references, for instance. The original is likely copyrighted, so this will be considered a Copy vio and likely to be deleted soon. As this is an important topic, in my opinion, my suggestion would be for you to substantially rewrite the article so that it is not a cut and paste version of your published article, at the same time adding in relevant Reliable sources. It still could likely be considered Original research, so it would benefit from use of as many independent, third-party sources as possible. Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 11:24, 14 December 2013 (UTC)