User talk:Soypark/sandbox

Peer review (SHK)
Three good things

I think the author tried to explain each terminology in detail. It makes the article so easy to understand, and it is not necessary to look at other articles, which makes me so comfortable to read her article. Also, most of contents seem to be reliable because she used great sources including papers and books. Overall, the article is well-organized and balanced and covering most of them that I want to know about Sanhujori.

Two things to be improved

It would be better that the lead paragraph covered all contents in the article. Now, the lead section include only the definition of Sanhujori, but I think it should also have brief introduction to other concepts and practices. I found that some words (e.g., n-3 fatty acids) should be linked to other article, which will make it more understandable and informative. Ksh8579 (talk) 20:17, 4 May 2017 (UTC)