User talk:SpLoT/Archive03

Christopher Hayes Locklear Kennedy
This person is notable because he represents a 40,000.00 member non federally recognized tribe. Kennedy's efforts in the art community support the federal recognition of the Lumbee tribe. He is one of the few Lumbee artist in the world. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chkennedy1 (talk • contribs) 14:40, 12 April 2007 (UTC).

Glenn Knight
Thanks for the complement... If you want to read a specific ST article from some bygone era, now you know who to call upon. :) &mdash;Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-26 10:10Z 

Tagging
I'll give it a go for a few - and point you to them - just to check that they look ok SatuSuro 05:25, 28 April 2007 (UTC)


 * If there is any issue with the template and the NA clas - I'll have to call from help from a friends who is good at fixing template issues SatuSuro


 * They fit fine - and there is already a large page of Category:Non-article Singapore articles - including articles that should not be there! I will be back later today or tommorow to work fuyrther through this issue - also it looks like lists are being included here as well. Any queries I will follow up later - cheers SatuSuro 05:36, 28 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Hmm - some project level issues as to whether lists or disambigs even get fitted to the project or not. It might be a few days before I have a proper look - anyways the plan is - to check the whole thing out and get back here and at the noticebvoard - worst case scenario - a week. cheers SatuSuro 05:46, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

AID
Thanks for your vote on WP:AID. Just a friendly reminder to update the vote counter at the top of the nomination when you vote for a nomination. I think you forgot to for your vote to the nominations Casino and Iron, so please just remember for the future. Happy Editing! Felix 13:12, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 15:50, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

You helped choose carbon dioxide as this week's WP:ACID winner
Spamsara 22:07, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Singapore Meetup 4 date changed
Hi SpLoT, you originally indicated here that you were interested to attend the meetup. However, due to the lack of response, the date of the meetup has been changed to November. Please refer to this page for more information. -- ZhongHan (Email) 04:57, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Created article
I have created the 2006-07 Southeast Asian floods article. Please feel free to improve and expand the article further. -- S iva1979 Talk to me 05:58, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

View comments
I hope you can take your time in viewing my comments here Your opinion in this will be helpful. -- S iva1979 Talk to me 08:56, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Request for Reassessment
Hi SpLoT, I was recently approached by a reviewer to further improve my article, Gan Eng Seng School after it was identified & listed under WikiProject Schools on Jul 16. As such, i've improved & expanded on it substantially as per his recommendations recently. As u r the original SG assessor, kindly reassess my article again. Thks! -- Aldwinteo 03:07, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thks for yr speedy reassessment. I prefer my articles to be assess by responsible peers so as to ascertain its quality & to evaluate any constructive comments for its improvement. Fyi, i take it as my responsibility to improve on the abv article based on the feedback received for the betterment of Wikipedia and not with the intention of obtaining a GA subsequently. Whether the relevant review board wanted to suggest or promote it to GA or not, i'll take either decision with equanmity. Aldwinteo 12:10, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Little context in Infalliable
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Infalliable, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Infalliable is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Infalliable, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:57, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

User:SpLoT/Sandbox/TCurrent
Do you mind if I copy this and try to get it fully working? ---CWY2190TC 03:39, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Tropical Storm Danas
Regarding to Tropical Storm Danas (11W), I know as of this time models from JMA and JTWC doesn't say that it will make landfall. But, tracks of tropical disturbances change and doesn't correspond to the current models of meteorological agencies. If the models are right, it's wind bands still will affect Japan. As of this time, it is not yet affecting any place but warnings are now in place. A-yao 09:41, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Happy 1st edit day
 Pat Politics rule!  20:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Userpage link on fr.wiki
peut tu m'activer ma page utilisateur car je n'arrive pas à le faire tout seul merci Aymeric78 21:51, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
 * salut
 * excuses moi, je me suis trompé, je suis désolé Aymeric78 15:09, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Tropical Storm speeds
For the legend of the graphical timeline in the Timeline of the 2007 Pacific typhoon season article I used the speeds given in Tropical cyclone scales, which list a tropical storm as 63-88 km/h (10 min avg.), not 63-117 km/h. I realize that is how tropical storms are defined elsewhere in the world, but aren't the numbers I gave correct for that region of the world and also make the colors consistent with their usage in the graphical timeline? Also, it's less confusing than having two overlapping definitions. Perhaps using the West Pacific scale in the graphical timeline with more clarification in the article would be a good compromise? Once that's done Timeline of the 2006 Pacific typhoon season should be updated the same way. -- Hi  Ev  04:26, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Re: Your comment on my talk page... Actually I did "bother to read" the explanatory section, however it doesn't make any sense for the agencies that determine what rank each storm gets to use a 1-minute average for all storms except for severe tropical storms, and that simply doesn't seem to be the case anyways. The text in Tropical cyclone scales indicates that all storms measured in most of the West Pacific are based on a 10 minute average, not a 1 minute average most of the time and a 10 minute average for one.  (That section is also where I got the "typhoon ≥118 km/h" information.)  Aren't the descriptions given in the Timeline section all based on 10 minute averages?  The article seems to indicate that only the US uses 1 minute averages, China uses 2 minute averages, and everyone else uses 10 minute averages.  The Tropical cyclone scales section also notes that both JMA and JTWC use ten minute averages.  However, it gets worse.  That section also notes that the JMA and JTWC have different speed ranges for almost everything, and only the JMA uses the term "severe tropical storm."  Ugh.  Any idea how to fix the legend now to work with both the JMA and JTWC definitions? --  Hi  Ev  06:14, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, an article should probably use only one system whenever possible to avoid confusion and error, and since the JMA numbers are official we should probably go with that. Either way, those typhoons could still be sub-divided into category 1-5 based on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale (SSHS) for easier comparison with other regions (though it looks like cat 1 overlaps STS, right?) with a notation that the SSHS isn't actually used by the JMA.  Or perhaps we should just move this to the article's talk page and start a discussion/straw poll to see what others think?  That would probably be better than us two deciding this for ourselves since be both agree it's not a simple question. --  Hi  Ev  08:28, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * P.S. Thanks for the correction on the JTWC's system. As for reverting back, I think we should stick with the JMA's system for the pre-typhoon numbers, though that means that the legend/explanatory section still needs further corrections. --  Hi  Ev  08:48, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd be OK with using JMA 10-min for everything below typhoon, but admittedly it's not my field. I say you should fix the page to use that for now, and also bring it up on WT:WPTC to see if anyone has a better suggestion.  Don't forget to note that Timeline of the 2006 Pacific typhoon season also needs to be updated to match 2007. --  Hi  Ev  09:22, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Reference for eye wall of Haiyan
Seems that this was the eye wall of Haiyan. http://www.uploadhouse.com/viewfile.php?id=594171 So can you undo the words or type the words with a better expressive way........thanks  Hihiperson 04:40, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Hey!
Hey, thanks for the welcome! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ngch89 (talk • contribs) 10:47, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Admin
Hi. I just wondered if you'd consider letting me nominate you for adminship, as you seem experienced enough. Thanks. Epbr123 10:21, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Putra Post.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Putra Post.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:58, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Meetup/Singapore 4
Hi, you have been invited to attend the SGpedians' meetup on 29 December 2007. We are planning to make this a full day event, but you may join/leave at anytime you wish. If you can or cannot make it, please leave your name here. It will be good to have you at the meetup. Terence (talk) 08:01, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

WPTC Active Members
The WikiProject Tropical cyclones has changed greatly since it was first started, and according to our main page we now have 87 members. However, we only have a small group of members that are still active, and as such, I am sending this out to all users on the participants list. If you are still active, please sign your name here. If you do not wish to be part of the project any more, or if you do not answer to this, you will be placed on an inactive users list after a period of two weeks. If you wish to rejoin after you are put on the inactive users list, you are welcome to rejoin. Cheers. --Hurricanehink ( talk ) 18:46, 16 December 2007 (UTC)