User talk:SpaceCaptain

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 21:32, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Good job on the HHverse
A year ago when I came to Wiki I also started my edits from Honorverse :) I feel I should warn you that short (stub) articles about fictional things tend to get listed on Votes for deletion and either are deleted or (more often) forcibly merged with some other fictional article. So when you create a new honorverse article, you may want to expand it more and remove the stub note ASAP. Happy editing! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 13:15, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I happen to be one of the people who feel that stubs are better than no article. Anyway, I do want to expand them, and I will, but I haven't read most of the books in years and don't remember information about the characters accurately enough to add it to the articles. I created the articles hoping that someone more knowledgeable than myself would add to them. Oh, and I'm glad you noticed them. SpaceCaptain 01:35, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Hello!
Good to see that you are still working on the Honorverse articles. I wasn't sure if you had just started the stubs and forgotten about them or not. I started an article on Gryphon today, so now we have articles on all three planets in the Manticore system.*Kat* 03:31, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)

Thunderbirds
There's some question about where you got the information on the time setting of the show. Would you mind saying a bit at Talk: Thunderbirds (TV series) about where 2026 comes from? -- Antaeus Feldspar 14:32, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

A question on external links
I just wondered: How can we be sure Wikipedia doesn't link to sites containing viruses, spyware or other harmful programs? SpaceCaptain 16:15, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * IMHO Wikipedia cannot be responsible for that, the editor is. The situation today on the web in general requires the end use to take such responsibility by using anti-spyware and anti-viral software.  Anyway, SpaceCaptain I came to your discussion page because I noticed you authored some of the Day of Defeat entry.  If you have any inpute about the railroad maps or anything else about DoD, please edit. major.T 17:30, 17 Apr 2005 (HST)

I know absolutely nothing about Day of Defeat; all I did was add a missing "a". SpaceCaptain 04:21, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Copyright
Your comment at Talk:Camelback locomotive shows, I suspect, a misunderstanding of copyright. Facts and information are not copyrightable. Only the expression of them can be. As the stating of only one reference hints, the article is based on only one source. Thus it will contain information derived only from there. It does desperately need other sources, so if you have any, feel free to add information. &mdash;Morven 08:46, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)

I thought that incuding all the same information, organized and phrased similarly, might be grounds for complaint. I haven't read much on copyright law. And sorry, I don't know any other good sources for information on camelbacks - they're not exactly my favorite locomotives... SpaceCaptain 00:49, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Thank you, Grunt!
And somebody should block Netaholic. SpaceCaptain 00:46, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

What is NPOV?
No, I'm not asking because I don't know. I'm asking because it seems many people on Wikipedia don't know. A huge number of articles seem to be written on the assumption that NPOV should be mildly positive toward its subject. (This is not to say that I haven't seen overly positive and overly negative tones.) SpaceCaptain 15:18, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Fire Upon the Deep
Someone added a trivia item to the FUtD article that says that Woodcarver's parliament chamber is in the form of a hypercube or tesseract. You then made some minor correction to it. I've been thumbing through my copy and am totally unable to find this reference. Have you any idea where it is? Dyolf Knip 03:43, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

My correction was just fixing the spelling. I don't own the book - read a library copy a couple years ago. I can't be relied on for most details... but how could a parliament chamber on a primitive world be 4-dimensional? It doesn't make sense to me. SpaceCaptain 01:27, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

Portal/project
Is there a portal or a project on the Honorverse? Akako |  &#9742;  12:25, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

No. If you want to know if a project exists, check List_of_WikiProjects. SpaceCaptain 23:55, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

I must be going insane.
I don't think we're in Kansas anymore. I distinctly remember making this edit, and changing nothing but the link to "grappling iron" to "grappling hook". Thank you for fixing the mess, and I'm sorry for whatever caused it in the first place... and at a loss at what that was. Geez. --Kizor 04:34, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Jason Alvarez merged into List of Honorverse characters
Thought you'd want to know. And we are now working on 'prettyfying' that list, as well as list of ships (I advertised wiki entries on Bar and we have some newcomers). Feel free to join in if you have time :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 19:14, 15 July 2006 (UTC) At last, that annoying task is done! I don't do much work on the Honorverse articles anymore since I gave up reading the series. SpaceCaptain 15:28, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Go to WP:SB....
Go to WP:SB, the storytelling section and check out Alien Horror. Martial Law 06:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Hawkwing-class
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Hawkwing-class, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Hawkwing-class. Jack Merridew 13:35, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Impeller drive
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Impeller drive, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --EEMIV (talk) 13:45, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Looks like it's already been merged. SpaceCaptain (talk) 18:29, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Allen Summervale
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Allen Summervale, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 (talk) 18:20, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

A number of Honorverse character articles have criticisms of notability and quality, though not all of these are proposed for deletion. There needs to be some standardization across the set; some procedure developed. SpaceCaptain (talk) 18:20, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hello,

Whenever possible, please remember to leave an edit summary before you save your edits. This makes things much easier for other Wikipedians and helps avoid confusion.

Thanks!

—BMRR (talk) 18:46, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Adrienne Warshawski
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Adrienne Warshawski, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * appears to be little more than an unsourced article

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 (talk) 17:27, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Thomas Theisman
I have nominated Thomas Theisman, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Thomas Theisman. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jack Merridew 08:35, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Adrienne Warshawski
I have nominated Adrienne Warshawski, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Adrienne Warshawski. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jack Merridew 08:47, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Andermani Empire


The article Andermani Empire has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:

Andermani Empire – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (talk) 07:47, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Orion's Arm
An editor has nominated Orion's Arm, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.Robofish (talk) 21:56, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of EMD BB40-2 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EMD BB40-2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/EMD BB40-2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rhadow (talk) 20:45, 28 October 2017 (UTC)