User talk:SpaceSandwich

Einstein
Please stop edit warring and at least make an attempt at getting support for your edits.  Volunteer Marek  04:36, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

2020 Belarusian protests
Please stop edit warring and instead actually make an effort to discuss your changes on the talk page and get support, especially when you've been told twice to go to the talk page and have decided to ignore it. Your behaviour is very unhelpful. Mellk (talk) 00:39, 19 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Please also preview your edits, or at least check them after you've done them., the effect of your edit was to make the whole page look a complete mess. Boud (talk) 02:33, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Belarusian Left Party "A Just World"
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Belarusian Left Party "A Just World". Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Martopa (talk) 07:34, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Notice
2A02:C7F:BE04:700:95AD:428E:B27:10DB (talk) 13:50, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
You have been mentioned here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Apollo_The_Logician Snooganssnoogans (talk) 19:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Hello, I'm Horse Eye's Back. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Xi Jinping‎ have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 18:14, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Edit-warring on Democratic Party (United States)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 21:03, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Maxim Gorky, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 14:11, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Uyghur genocide has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits.  See template usage: "First add a new section named "Disputed" to the article's talk page, describing the problems with the disputed statements." Normchou   💬 01:00, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Edit Warring on Joseph Stalin
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Personal attacks
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Israel. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please remove or strike your comment. Jr8825  •  Talk  15:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)


 * I cam here to say the same, and the vulgarities have been redacted. Please consider your words with care, and treat fellow editors better. Zaathras (talk) 00:29, 22 January 2021 (UTC)


 * And again. Why do you do this? Zaathras (talk) 23:06, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello, I'm Darubrub. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, History of the Democratic Party (United States), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Darubrub (talk) 00:18, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021 2
Placed because of this attack. Vici Vidi (talk) 06:48, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Sorry ...
... for my undo at Dictator. I meant to merely undo the removal of Erdogan, but it looks like I also removed your tags. I'll leave them sitting there. Cheers. - DVdm (talk) 00:51, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * No worries! -- SpaceSandwich (talk) 3:12, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Meanwhile someone removed it again, but I restored it with sources. See Talk:Dictator. Your input is welcome! - DVdm (talk) 11:15, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * By the way, I do agree with . Best to open a talk page entry about that pov-tag. - DVdm (talk) 14:12, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Warning
I suggest you to stop with wrongful edits, removal of sourced text, claiming lack of neutrality while there isn't and violating rules and procedure in general, otherwise I will have to report your edits to the Project and report you as a problematic user. You've been already warned by others, especially regarding personal attacks and other issues, don't make it more bad than already is. Lone Internaut (talk) 14:15, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Example? Darubrub (talk) 14:38, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

This language is unacceptable. Please treat other editors with respect. Darubrub (talk) 15:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


 * This is clearly harassment that you are engaging in, but it has become apparent to me at this point that Wikipedia is a website that does not seek to provide factual information, but rather to push an agenda that aligns with that of corporate media

I'm done with you, if you want to join a less biased encyclopedia, you can join right here:

I will be back...

SpaceSandwich (talk) 15:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

ANI NOTICE
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Lone Internaut (talk) 16:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Indefinite block
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for beyond the pale harassment. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. El_C 16:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)