User talk:SpacemanSpiff/Archives/2011/May

Suspected sock, of a sock
Hi, a couple of days ago you blocked User:Kongu_Kaviyarasu_Gounder as a suspected sock, seemingly without going through SPI. Today an SPA has appeared on the same subject, clearly knows their way around posting refs to talk pages etc and is in a vague sort of way POV-pushing. The pattern is very similar, the language is very similar. The user is User:Palani_Anda_Nadu_Kongan_venman - could this be a new sock? - Sitush (talk) 14:48, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks like konguboy/pon deepankar. Spiff said he was going to be offline for this month and to report konguboy socks to User:Tnxman307 or file an SPI.--Sodabottle (talk) 15:14, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Oh yes, this is him, creating an SPI to say he's a new user! I'll be off for a month (I think the note at the top of the talk page is probably not visible, will add it to the edit notice), I'll block this and protect a few of the frequently impacted pages now. cheers. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  15:31, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you. I did see your note about being away, but thought that I would chance it as (here at least) it is still April. I've dealt with Tnxman before but the guidance about referring to him is appreciated also. - Sitush (talk) 17:25, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes, I did mean May, but was hoping to not get online for the last couple of days of April too :). BTW, since many of the maps he's uploaded here were deleted, he's gone ahead and uploaded them at Commons. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  04:39, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 May 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:07, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Need attention
See this plz. This IP is used by Pandiyann and earlier also indulged in personal attacks like this and this. 203.75.23.20 (talk) 13:00, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Letting the Shudra fur fly...
In my ongoing project to target "caste puffery", I dove into Kapu (caste). Started footnoting everything I can, and also pretty swiftly found that they are (as I suspected) listed as an "upper Shudra" caste in most academic references. I added that in, so I expect to see some hatred and discontent coming my way from IPs, particularly as the article gets 4.5k hits per months. I don't feel I'm being at all malicious by adding "Shudra" to articles where documentable, but I do derive some satisfaction from the idea that I'm fighting POV and forcing people to come to terms with academic reality. I know you're pretty busy, so not asking your involvement, but thought you might find it interesting. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:31, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 May 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:34, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Need comments on this RFC - [| discussion]
Need your views and comments. One should also go through ['no consensus' discussion]. ..असक्तः सततं कार्य कर्म समाचर &#124; असक्तः हि आचरन् कर्म.. Humour Thisthat2011  07:10, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Vote on article name
Hello. You are invited to take part in a 'Gordion knot vote' with three options on the future title of List of Indian inventions and discoveries. Regards Gun Powder Ma (talk) 09:42, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

AfD
I see you are away at the moment, which is unfortunate. In any case, an article you created Julie Stockton, has been nominated for deletion; see Articles for deletion/Julie Stockton. The nominator seems a bit inexperienced and hasn't notified you, so I'm taking care of that for them. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 14:42, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Two Leaves and a Bud for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Two Leaves and a Bud is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Two Leaves and a Bud until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wading through the miasma (talk) 08:22, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for sloth. Drmies (talk) 16:05, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 May 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:14, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

really thanks spaceman......guide me when im update anything....if mistakenly i did anything while sharing any article or pics pls leave me a msg...so that i can correct my mistake....thanks user.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregviswanath (talk • contribs) 11:56, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 May 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:29, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Request
Can you please withdraw my reviewer, autopatrolled and rollbacker privileges. I've already messaged a couple of administrators before but I received no response.- The Enforcer Office of the secret service 03:04, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Not necessary now.- The Enforcer Office of the secret service 12:01, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Raja Raja Chola Award
- The Enforcer Office of the secret service 12:00, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 May 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 20:24, 31 May 2011 (UTC)