User talk:SpacemanSpiff/Archives/2011/November

The Signpost: 31 October 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 18:15, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

pondheepankar
He is back as. Have created an SPI here --Sodabottle (talk) 16:33, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 November2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 13:19, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

protecting and editing the page 'shahid balwa'
Hi, Previously due to vandalism you had protected the page "Shahid Balwa". After the page was unprotected there have been certain edits with specific intentions of maligning the name of a living person.

The reson these edits should not be allowed: DB Realty is an independent company which is not named in the charge sheet by the CBI in the 2G scam. The company named is Swan Telecom which is another independent company all together.

References:

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/2g-db-realty-distances-itself-from-etisalat/748897/

"First of all, I would like to clarify one thing that is DB Realty and ETISALAT DB have no connection," Vinod Goenka, the other Managing Director of the Rs 3,200-crore real estate firm said. "There is no share holding of DB Realty in Etisalat DB barring the investments (in Swan Telecom) which are made by Shahid and me in our personal capacity. There is no other connection between the two companies. This I must clarify to everyone," he said.

http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/no-equity-connectionetisalat-db-realty_522204.html

"In an interview to CNBC-TV18, Vinod Goenka, co-promoter of the company said that DB Realty has no equity connection with Etisalat-DB. He also clarified that Etisalat was not considering pulling out of the telecom venture in India."

Secondly even though Shahid Balwa is in custody he is an under trail NO case has as yet been proven against him so judging him guilty is not right. 202.179.91.46 (talk) 10:19, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 November 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 23:26, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Dirty Picture.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:The Dirty Picture.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 November 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:49, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

ANI
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The section is Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents - Sitush (talk) 03:20, 28 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Nothing to say on this, have been away for a while now to comment. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  09:21, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 November 2011

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 07:40, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

India i.e Bharat
Accorrding to Constitution of India

India, also known as Bharat, is a Union of States.It is a Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic with a parliamentary system of government. The Republic is governed in terms of the Constitution of India which was adopted by the Constituent Assembly on 26th November 1949 and came into force on 26th January 1950.

so what is the problem if someone writes india i.e bharat on the wiki page of india  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sujit900 (talk • contribs) 14:12, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * It has been discussed on the talk page as has been explained to you before. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  14:15, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

yeah but it's the constitution which is saying india and Bharat are the two name of our country. whats wrong?User:Sujit900 —Preceding undated comment added 14:26, 30 November 2011 (UTC).