User talk:SpacemanSpiff/Archives/2021/June

What vandalisation content did I posted on opindia page ?
Hi, (This is me Jarvis (talk) 02:04, 3 June 2021 (UTC)) You just reverted my contribution to opindia page and given the reason of promoting vandalism. PLEASE MENTION ME WHAT CONTENT OF MINE WAS PROMOTING VANDALISM. I need this answer from you. Because you are working against Wikipedia's policy. The current page available now is full of hatred and promotes vandalism which should get removed. I have corrected the page and just put down a professional approach of mentioning things without going into remarking fake news or anti-muslim. The current page promoted hatred and vandalism. And for you kind information, i have tried to mention fake news on other pages which genuinely does it. But it was reverted so Wikipedia needs to have a neutral approach. If they are not allowing to write fake news on others for which proof is there, this portion should also be removed from this page , or if you consider proof.then should also be added to other.

I NEED A PROPER ANSWER FROM YOU. THANK YOU. (This is me Jarvis (talk) 02:04, 3 June 2021 (UTC))
 * If you're here to just push your POV, you will be blocked. That's the proper answer. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  03:33, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

I want to know which portion of content I added promotes vandalism. PLS MENTION (This is me Jarvis (talk) 15:49, 3 June 2021 (UTC))
 * You removed well sourced and discussed content to change the meaning to suit your POV, this isn't your first time and if you can't understand that then you shouldn't be editing Wikipedia. Any further such behavior and you will be blocked. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  16:08, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

There is a website Alt News which had spread fake news for which reliable sources are available. I have tried to mention that on wikipedia which is not my POV but the reality. Why have wikipedia reverted it which is the reality ? (This is me Jarvis (talk) 16:41, 3 June 2021 (UTC))
 * That you refuse to consider yourself exempt from all our policies is not my problem. If you have an issue with any article, discuss on that talk page, any further POV pushing and you will be blocked. That's it. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  17:12, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Ihaveabandonedmychild
FYI - I've indeffed for a personal attack which also touches on the AE conditions regarding the topic of Vanniyar which you imposed. Cabayi (talk) 09:28, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Article : List of Brahmins
Hi, Somedays back I was blocked for BLP. (Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons) Editors must take particular care when adding information about living persons to any Wikipedia page. Such material requires a high degree of sensitivity, and must adhere strictly to all applicable laws in the United States, to this policy, and to Wikipedia's three core content policies: Neutral point of view (NPOV) Verifiability (V) No original research (NOR)

The sources i attached clearly was from reputed news magazine and books. But still i got blocked. You could verify my referenced sites and provide me with which sources where non-verifiable or false claiming.

All of my edits have been removed. In case my claim is truthful could you revert the edit. Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 07:54, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Any Update on the above Statement. Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 08:43, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Could I proceed to Revert my edits Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 08:43, 9 June 2021 (UTC)