User talk:Spacevezon

The Signpost: 6 December 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 04:19, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of London school bus routes


The article List of London school bus routes has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * School bus routes are not a notable encyclopedic subject. Fails WP:N, WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTTRAVEL.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Charles (talk) 21:31, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of List of London school bus routes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of London school bus routes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of London school bus routes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Charles (talk) 21:37, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

ANEW
I've closed a report on you at WP:ANEW. You were never notified. Still, you should read the report and my comments. You should also be careful of edit-warring without perhaps realizing that's what you're doing. Try to keep track of your edits.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:02, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

WP:ANI courtesy notification
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Thank you. —Dianna (talk) 15:29, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Annoying
Do you realise how annoying it is to have tags slapped on your work while you are working? No you probably don't. J3Mrs (talk) 20:57, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Deletion Proposal of book storage
I disagree with the proposal. I believe it is a large enough, significant enough, and specific enough topic to be worthy of an article. It obviously will require vast expansion, but in the meantime i am against deletion. Obviously feel free to help. --*NoTA* 20:33, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Kristijh. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, In Aménas hostage crisis, and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, Kristijh

im working on it
dude calm down i obviously not completed my article and why are you even on aspen academy thats a school that was just opened. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex80454 (talk • contribs) 23:39, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Talk:List of London school bus routes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Talk:List of London school bus routes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talk:List of London school bus routes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Charles (talk) 19:36, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of List of London school bus routes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of London school bus routes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of London school bus routes & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Charles (talk) 20:11, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Le Mayet-de-Montagne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Auvergne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Somain-Péruwelz Railway, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Somain and Single track (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:27, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Somain-Halluin Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Somain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:44, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikiproject Transport Newsletter September 2013
Delivered by  Rcsprinter  (whisper)  @ 16:30, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of RateSetter


A tag has been placed on RateSetter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  DGG ( talk ) 00:10, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikiproject Transport Newsletter September 2013
Delivered by  Rcsprinter  (shout)  @ 14:35, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikiproject Transport Newsletter September 2013
Delivered by  Rcsprinter  (confer)  @ 15:14, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikiproject Transport Newsletter March 2014
Delivered by  Rcsprinter123    (indicate)  @ 16:55, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Halluin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parti Socialiste (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikiproject Transport Newsletter May 2014
Delivered by  Rcsprinter123    (deliver)  @ 19:17, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Population update project
Hi. The 18th edition of Ethnologue just came out, and if we divide up our language articles among us, it won't take long to update them. I would appreciate it if you could help out, even if it's just a few articles (5,000 articles is a lot for just me), but I won't be insulted if you delete this request.

A largely complete list of articles to be updated is at Category:Language articles citing Ethnologue 17. The priority articles are in Category:Language articles with old Ethnologue 17 speaker data. These are the 10% that have population figures at least 25 years old.

Probably 90% of the time, Ethnologue has not changed their figures between the 17th and 18th editions, so all we need to do is change "e17" to "e18" in the reference (ref) field of the language info box. That will change the citation for the artcle to the current edition. Please put the data in the proper fields, or the info box will flag it as needing editorial review. The other relevant fields are "speakers" (the number of native speakers in all countries), "date" (the date of the reference or census that Ethnologue uses, not the date of Ethnologue!), and sometimes "speakers2". Our convention has been to enter e.g. "1990 census" when a census is used, as other data can be much older than the publication date. Sometimes a citation elsewhere in the article depends on the e17 entry, in which case you will need to change "name=e17" to "name=e18" in the reference tag (assuming the 18th edition still supports the cited claim).

Remember, we want the *total* number of native speakers, which is often not the first figure given by Ethnologue. Sometimes the data is too incompatible to add together (e.g. a figure from the 1950s for one country, and a figure from 2006 for another), in which case it should be presented that way. That's one use for the "speakers2" field. If you're not sure, just ask, or skip that article.

Data should not be displayed with more than two, or at most three, significant figures. Sometimes it should be rounded off to just one significant figure, e.g. when some of the component data used by Ethnologue has been approximated with one figure (200,000, 3 million, etc.) and the other data has greater precision. For example, a figure of 200,000 for one country and 4,230 for another is really just 200,000 in total, as the 4,230 is within the margin of rounding off in the 200,000. If you want to retain the spurious precision of the number in Ethnologue, you might want to use the sigfig template. (First parameter in this template is for the data, second is for the number of figures to round it off to.)

Dates will often need to be a range of all the country data in the Ethnologue article. When entering the date range, I often ignore dates from countries that have only a few percent of the population, as often 10% or so of the population isn't even separately listed by Ethnologue and so is undated anyway.

If Ethnologue does not provide a date for the bulk of the population, just enter "no date" in the date field. But if the population figure is undated, and hasn't changed between the 17th & 18th editions of Ethnologue, please leave the ref field set to "e17", and maybe add a comment to keep it so that other editors don't change it. In cases like this, the edition of Ethnologue that the data first appeared in may be our only indication of how old it is. We still cite the 14th edition in a couple dozen articles, so our readers can see that the data is getting old.

The articles in the categories linked above are over 90% of the job. There are probably also articles that do not currently cite Ethnologue, but which we might want to update with the 18th edition. I'll need to generate another category to capture those, probably after most of the Ethnologue 17 citations are taken care of.

Jump in at the WP:LANG talk page if you have any comments or concerns. Thanks for any help you can give!

— kwami (talk) 02:14, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Royal Air Force/Did you know/Archive
Portal:Royal Air Force/Did you know/Archive, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Royal Air Force/Did you know/Archive and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Royal Air Force/Did you know/Archive during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DexDor(talk) 22:11, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of London Buses route 403 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article London Buses route 403 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/London Buses route 403 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jeni ( talk ) 14:40, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Edmonton green station.JPG listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Edmonton green station.JPG, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:13, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:British Army
Portal:British Army, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:British Army and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Portal:British Army during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 04:01, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Royal Air Force
Portal:Royal Air Force, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Royal Air Force and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Royal Air Force during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 04:10, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Bus l 236.JPG


The file File:Bus l 236.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Poor quality orphaned image with no foreseeable encyclopedic use."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 13:02, 20 October 2019 (UTC)