User talk:Spada2

Re: Oliva
Please consider your reversion of Oliva at the 2013 albums of Heavy Metal. It is not "Jon Oliva's Pain", that band don't even exist anymore. It is actually Oliva, the first solo album by ex-Savatage leader Jon Oliva. Check the album cover and please don't get misleaded by the old and outdated source quoted. Thanks. Arsenanuf (talk) 21:18, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Re: Band
Hi, please take a look at WP:CITE which describes how to use citations in articles. WP:FN will also help in how to create inline citations, and WP:RS will let you know what is acceptable to be used as a reference in an article. Gary King ( talk ) 14:29, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It looks pretty good. Please take a look at WP:MUSIC, which outlines the circumstances under which a musical ensemble is considered notable. Gary King ( talk ) 14:22, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

PSR

 * It needs references that aren't from the record label or any websites related to it. The article should have references such as newspapers, journals, etc. Gary King ( talk ) 16:13, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: Songfacts
Sorry, it looks like the article was deleted before I could take a look at it. Gary King ( talk ) 17:07, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Arashk
Non-notable This is pretty much a perfect example of a non-notable band. Even if they were self-produced, unsigned, etc., they could be notable if there were sufficient citations from credible, verifiable third-party sources; there aren't. I'm marking this with db-band. Please post on my talk if you'd like to respond and in the future, feel free to be bold yourself and if you mistakenly suggest a page for deletion, there's no penalty. Alternately, feel free to post to my talk anytime as well. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 14:50, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * More Looking at the articles--which don't have assertions of notability--and doing a quick Google search make me confident that db-band and db-album apply here as well. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 13:45, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Notability
Thanks Establishing notability involves two things (as I see it): an assertion that the topic is notable and a verifiable, credible source to prove it. Simply writing about (e.g.) a band and saying what occurred to them does not establish that it is notable. Statements such as appearing on the soundtrack to a motion picture are a start, but are altogether pretty weak. Have they appeared on a sales chart? Did they play at a large festival or tour with an established act? Have their albums been reviewed by the music press? These will further establish notability. Wikipedia does not publish original research, so anything that you add, should be supported by a verifiable source that is credible and preferably third-party. Consequently, on The Yellow Dogs, using MySpace is not a good source, as 1.) it has no editorial credibility and anyone can publish anything on the site and 2.) it is produced by the band itself, making it first-party; these sources are not banned strictly speaking, but it is difficult to prove that a topic is notable with first-party sources. Citations from the Huffington Post and Spinner are stronger as they are recognizable media outlets. I don't know anything about Iranian.com, so it could be a good source or a weak one.

Sorg Innkallelse references Metal-Archives in its external links and they are signed to a record label which does not have its own article on Wikipedia; this sort of article does not really establish notability. Tarantist does not establish notability at all: many bands have MySpace accounts or have released albums, but not all of them deserve articles in a general-interest encyclopedia. Sasy Mankan claims that one of his singles was more famous than his others, but how famous? How many copies did it sell? Did it appear on any charts or receive any sales certifications? Did it gain him notoriety outside of Iran?

Problems of asserting notability of Iranian acts are compounded by the fact that sources should ideally be in English on the English Wikipedia (but there is also a Persian Wikipedia where Persian sources are ideal.) Again, you can use Persian (or Urdu or Arabic) sources, but it's best to use English ones whenever possible. This should give you a pretty good overview of notability and if you need more help, you can continue to post to my talk or check out the help section or the Village Pump. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 14:31, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Addendum You can also try posting to the talk page of relevant WikiProjects e.g. WT:ALBUM, WT:SONG, or WT:MUSIC. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 14:32, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

The Yellow Dogs
Notability A simple Google search shows sources from CNN, Spinner, and The Huffington Post. This seems notable. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:16, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Reliable sources
Hi, please use reliable sources, not mere blog essays, for articles. I reverted their addition to Shiraz Arts Festival. Please check WP:RS again. Regards Hekerui (talk) 15:04, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

PRODding
Please make sure you use a descriptive edit summary when proposing an article for deletion. Doing so helps the admin who has to review the PROD after the week is up and ensures that anybody watching the article understands what you're doing. Thanks, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   17:00, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Morteza Hannaneh.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Morteza Hannaneh.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:53, 5 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 07:53, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Mastan_(film).jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Mastan_(film).jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 11:37, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Administrator intervention against vandalism
Thank you for your report on 79.127.9.204 at Administrator intervention against vandalism. For future reference, here are a few points about reporting at Administrator intervention against vandalism.
 * 1) If you click on "edit" you will see some templates for reporting. The relevant one in this case is  brief reason for listing (keep it short) ~ . There are several reasons why it is better to use these templates rather than hand-writing a new section, including the fact that it automatically provides links to user contributions etc, which is useful for admins considering the report, and the fact that a bot is programmed to automatically recognise reports in the standard format and deal with them appropriately.
 * 2) Administrator intervention against vandalism is for persistent vandalism. For a one-off event you can simply revert (as you did) and warn the user on their talk page.
 * 3) Except in very exceptional circumstances (such as serious libel) administrators will almost never take action against a vandal unless the vandal has received warnings and continued to vandalise after warnings. In this case no warnings were issued at all.
 * 4) I have reviewed the edits in question, and it seems to me that this may well be a good faith disagreement about the content of the article, rather than vandalism. It is not clear what the editor's intentions were, and it would have helped had they given edit summaries, but this does not seem to me to be unambiguously vandalism, and in doubtful cases we have to give the benefit of the doubt.

Please do make further vandalism reports when the need arises, but it will help if you take the above points into account. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:22, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Mahan_Esfahani.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mahan_Esfahani.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 21:52, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Niyaz(band).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Niyaz(band).jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 21:52, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Album ratings
Hello. Not all of them have to be summarized in the 5 or 10-star format. Only the ones that use star ratings in the actual review should require star templates on wikipedia. Template:Album ratings states the following:

The information in the score field should be the rating given in the review (e.g. 4/5). The rating should use the same format as in the review, to accurately portray the score of the review. For star ratings you should use the star rating template; for example, entering, will render:. Numerical ratings, letter grades and other non-symbol ratings should be shown using plain text in parentheses, like (3.5/10), (B) or (90%).

If you still don't like that, then maybe you could check out this part of the policies and guidelines page? Thanks and have a nice time editing wikipedia. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 18:46, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem; I'm glad to be of help. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 05:05, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Angra frontman.jpg
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Angra frontman.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because images on Wikipedia need to be compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike or another free license, which allow anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license cc-by-sa-3.0 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain. Note, if you did create this file, you may want to upload it to Wikimedia Commons, which will allow the image to be accessed by all Wikimedia Foundation projects (which include the various localized versions of Wikipedia)

If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Media copyright questions. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 01:43, 3 October 2010 (UTC) Martin H. (talk) 01:43, 3 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Also File:Dastan ensemble.jpg, File:Hamavayan Ensemble.jpg, File:Grand magus(live).jpg, File:Sima bina.jpg, File:Mastan (musical group).jpg and maybe more. Images licensed with NC (non-commercial) or ND (non-derivative) license conditions by theire respective copyright owners are not free and not accepted on Wikimedia projects except for non-free fair use. All content, except fair use content, on Wikimedia projects must be free. Free to reuse by anyone, anytime, anywhere for any purpose including modification and money making purposes. --Martin H. (talk) 01:54, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Majestic Vanguard
You tagged the article Majestic Vanguard for speedy deletion, but the deletion tag has been removed. You may like to try WP:PROD if you still think it should be deleted. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:25, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Musharaf Bangash‎
Salam refigh! Do you know Urdu? Could you help us in this discussion? Thanks.Farhikht (talk) 17:22, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Dorud rafigh, no I dont know Urdo but I know about music and I'll check it, you're welcome. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 07:20, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

mani nouri
Hamvatan salam, Doos daram az shoma bekham ke dar negah dashtan in page be ma komak konid. Shoma ham raay bar delete dade boodid. Dar pagetoon didam ke shoma ahle honar va music hastid, che khoob. Be onvane yek honardoost az shoma mikham ke talash konid ke in page baghi bemoone. Harche fekr mikonam mibinam ke tamame sources ha va reference ha javabgoo hastand. Ba dorood va tashakor. Mazerat mikham baraye farsi neveshtan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EshghamVatanam (talk • contribs) 16:40, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll be glad to help, you really need better sources to keep this article, check BBC Persian and reliable souces like that. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 08:07, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Kouros (singer)
Hi Spada2,

I noticed your advert template on the Career section of Kouros (singer), which was completely justified. I have attempted a tidy-up and would like you to take a look, and if what I've done is reasonable, perhaps you might consider taking the template away. I have written about the edit in the article's talk page, which is worth a look because it has a link to the same person under another article. I think these two articles should merge, but I would like you opinion. Many thanks,

Best wishes Acabashi (talk) 18:39, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, good, I removed the Advert temp but you still need to improve the article by providing reliable sources for that, I suggest to search in BBC Persian and sources like that. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 18:50, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Ahoora
Hello Spada2. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ahoora, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''Sources provided are enough for A7. Take to AFD if required.''' Thank you. Ged UK  14:10, 27 February 2011 (UTC)


 * thanks for letting me know, Its ok, the sources are provided. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 20:23, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Among the Echoes
Hello Spada2, a speedy deletion was removed from this article by the user Porchcrop. There were references and 20 Notability were asserted. Markdashney (talk) 10:53, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * No it's been replced by AFD by the administator. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 18:36, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy Delete on Fuseboxx
I removed your A7 Speedy delete from Fuseboxx. The article makes several claims about the importance of the band. The references are weak, and it may not survive if nominated to AFD on notability, but I think the claims are enough to avoid speedy delete, particularly in light of the article's age. Monty 845 (talk) 00:48, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Among the Echoes AfD
I'm afraid this is not correct. Anyone including the article author can contribute to an AfD (and remember that it's a discussion, not a vote). Please also be very careful about editing others' comments, especially at an AfD. It's considered a major breach of wikiquette (see WP:TPO). Thanks, EyeSerene talk 14:50, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


 * No probs. It can be helpful during an AfD if an editor discloses being the article author, but even that's not really necessary (it's usually pretty obvious and it's in the page history anyway for anyone that wants to check). Best, EyeSerene talk 08:36, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy delete
Hi, I had to decline the speedy delete of Area51 (band), but that's solely because the standards for a speedy A7 are very strict; the article makes an attempt to assert significance, and that's enough to rule out A7.

That being said, I agree with your assertion that the article is not notable. I suggest you bring the article to WP:AfD - saying that the article fails WP:BAND should be enough, unless I've missed something in my quick reference search. Cheers, -- Ja Ga  talk 20:39, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * thanks for letting me know, I just put AFD on that. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 10:10, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Abdolreza Razmjoo
The article author asked on my talk page for the article to be restored, because he added references after the delete !votes were made on 20 Jan. I have checked his edits after that point, and the only ones which might possibly affect the outcome are:
 * changing the link "Shore Kodaki"
 * from http://www.soundunwound.com/music/abdolreza-razmjoo/20547200 Soundunwound.com
 * to http://www.songtexte.com/artist/abdolreza-razmjoo-6bd0e6ca.html Songtexte


 * adding two sections:


 * See also
 * Music of Iran
 * List of Iranian musicians


 * Sources and Further reading


 * Weekly magazine Chelcheragh,iran(February 2002)
 * Nezafati,Iraj. "Kermanshah music", Kermanshah: Taq Bostan Publications, 1998. ISBN 964-5551-11

Would these changes have affected your delete opinion? Please reply below here - I will watch this page.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:35, 29 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi John, unfortunately No, soundwound and songtext are not reliable sources they are more like social networks from the otherhand I could not find anything about the artist on allmusic.com link, one can easily find articles or some basic information on allmusic.com about Persian artists. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 10:21, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

FYI
This will interest you, I expect -- given that you are also dealing with Jigsaw at AfD now.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:39, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 9
Hi. When you recently edited 21 (Rage Album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * thanks for the head up, I'll take care of it. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 14:50, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16
Hi. When you recently edited Arena (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shadowland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:34, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Karavan
Hello Spada2. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Karavan, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional, started as stub five years ago and getting spammed by band members or fans is by itself not a reason to throw it out completely. Thank you anyways for adressing it. Tikiwont (talk) 15:57, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Notable
I'm not particularly familiar with any of the source publishers, but a cursory examination suggests there are probably enough decent sources to meets WP:N. Sources 2, 4, 5, maybe 10, maybe 4, maybe 15. I doubt it'd be deleted at AfD, maybe no consensus rather than keep? Is there something particular you have in mind? Wily D 16:24, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Check 2
Please have a look at WP:NALBUMS, and don't mark my edits as vandalism. I'm going to undo your reverts to those Tankard albums: they are nothing but track lists and appear to have no notability of their own. Drmies (talk) 17:37, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The band is notable so their albums, a simple search on allmusic.com proves it. if you want to redirect or delete them put afd on them. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 07:59, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * No, that's simply not true. Uncle G pointed out on my talk page that being listed on AllMusice is not proof of notability. I doubt you actually looked at the guideline I pointed out. Opening sentence: "All articles on albums, singles or other recordings must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines." I could rest my case, but let's go on: "That an album is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article." It is convention that such articles on albums that have nothing but a tracklist, if they're likely (or plausible) search terms, be redirected to the artist. And what about this "vandalism" thing? Drmies (talk) 15:13, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * when an album is registered on allmusic you should be carefull and do simple search about it first as I did and found reliable reviews on blabbermouth and About.com, just added them to some of the articles you redirected, we're all here to improve wikipedia. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 15:45, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Blabbermouth is not a reliable source. Tracklists on AllMusic add nothing to notability. Drmies (talk) 18:27, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * It is reliable you can ask the experts on WikiProject Metal. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 07:34, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't need to ask them--I am one of the experts, and it's not a reliable source. You are welcome to try your luck at WP:RSN to get a ruling. Drmies (talk) 15:35, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Rage 21 album.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Rage 21 album.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:16, 2 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I took care of it, another editor uploaded a new file instead of uploading a new version! Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 07:45, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Two-Faced (Tankard album)
Hello, you may want to comment at the merge proposal. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 21:08, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Scorpio 1971 Tehran.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Scorpio 1971 Tehran.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 00:43, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
 * No the image comes from BBC Persian here: and if there was a copyright violation BBC would not use that image. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 14:47, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Morteza Hannaneh.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Morteza Hannaneh.jpg, which you've attributed to an unknown Iranian photographer. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 02:03, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Crematory Infinity 2010.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Crematory Infinity 2010.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Houshang ostovar.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Houshang ostovar.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:00, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Achim Köhler for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Achim Köhler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Achim Köhler until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 13:12, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Orphaned non-free image File:Powerwolf Bible of the Beast.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Powerwolf Bible of the Beast.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cardano (blockchain)


A tag has been placed on Cardano (blockchain) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Cardano (platform). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 19:46, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cardano (blockchain)


A tag has been placed on Cardano (blockchain) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Cardano (cryptocurrency). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 19:46, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Cardano (blockchain) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Cardano (blockchain), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – bradv  🍁  19:54, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

AFD
Hi, the creator of an article is free to vote keep or merge etc at AFD as per WP:AFD. They can also remove a Proposed deletion template. What they must not do is to remove speedy deletion tags on articles they've created, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 00:56, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Cardano sources
Hello, I have been keeping the Cardano draft alive for the past year using the talk page. In particular, I have built up reputable sources that can be used. I don't know if you have seen these: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft_talk:Cardano_(cryptocurrency_platform)IOHKwriter (talk) 09:16, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

New message from Stifle
Stifle (talk) 14:26, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cardano (cryptocurrency platform) has been accepted
 Cardano (cryptocurrency platform), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Cardano_(cryptocurrency_platform) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:53, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Sa'id Hormozi
A long time ago, you tagged this for better sources. I have added some sources and a little content. I'm removing the tag, but thought to let you know, in case you have concerns. Best wishes, Jacqke (talk) 02:38, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Charles Hoskinson
It was not "unconstructive" and I have reverted YOUR reversion. The references does not support him being a mathematician and it is for you to provide evidence that he is. Frankly, your message on the IP talk page is unwelcome, bullying and unjustified. Please stick to verified, correctly referenced material. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.214.35.94 (talk) 18:43, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Kamkars.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kamkars.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ✗ plicit  12:10, 28 March 2022 (UTC)