User talk:Spadeoking

Speedy deletion nomination of Camren Williams


A tag has been placed on Camren Williams requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Wildthing61476 (talk) 19:07, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Camren Williams
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Camren Williams, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 19:13, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Camren Williams. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 19:13, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Camren Williams. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 19:19, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

I don't see how it could be tagged for speedy deletion...it's a real person who is signifcant in the realm of sports. It may not be Peyton Manning or Ryan Leaf but over time this athlete will be in the same breath as those types of players. Being a high caliber football recruit should justify the addition of a wiki page in my opinion. But it's not my opinion that counts I'm just trying to add to the vast amount of knowledge Wiki has.


 * You may want to look over WP:ATHLETE, specifically the section about College Athletes. It's clear that Camren doesn't meet these standards as of right now, however if he does in the future, then the article can be re-created. Also, there are other articles about athletes, but this is due to them meeting the standards in WP:ATHLETE. Wildthing61476 (talk) 19:25, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

So once Camren does Gain national media attention as an individual, not just as a player for a notable team I'll be able to add him? that's what number 3 says. I suppose notibility through relation isn't good enough correct?

And for the record I didn't know I was deleting the "auto delete" thing off the top of my page I saw the code on the top with and I thought it was something I put in there.

Speedy deletion nomination of Brent Wilkerson


A tag has been placed on Brent Wilkerson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Wildthing61476 (talk) 19:30, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Just delete them I thought they met the standards and cearly I was mistaken. I spent an abundant amount of time doing what seems like a rather inadequate couple of articles. I won't stop trying to find something worth posting on Wikipedia but I suppose I'll take a break for now.