User talk:Spader1

Reply
Hi, thanks for email. You have an obvious conflict of interest and you should have declared it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . If you are being compensated, you must provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared.. Also read the following regarding writing an article:
 * you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
 * Your bare url refs were mainly to his own site, blogs, press releases and interviews with him, not independent third-party sources as required here


 * The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
 * significant coverage in
 * independent,
 * multiple,
 * reliable,
 * secondary sources.
 * Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.
 * It's all about what the company sells, little about the company itself. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of factories and employees, management structure, turnover or profits.


 * You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
 * Your page was virtually fact-free gushing spam eg Drawing inspiration from the vibrant streets of Stockholm as well as classic fashion staples, Diemonde seamlessly blends these influences to create its unique style. The brand's vision goes beyond just fashion; it aims to symbolize and inspire a new generation. Through its designs, Diemonde seeks to narrate the evolving story of modern Swedish culture[2]. While the designs exude a minimalist and clean aesthetic, the brand embodies a borderless mindset, embracing diverse languages and cultures from various parts of the world. No actual facts, just blatant promo. And that's just the lead, the rest is in the same vein.


 * There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * You had multiple such links.


 * You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
 * Since it was obvious spam anyway, I didn't check for copyright.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article.

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: Your reason should indicate what topics you will edit if you are unblocked, you won't be allowed to continue writing about this company. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:44, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

If you want to reply to me, you can leave a message on this page, and I will know you have done so if you start it with my user name, User:Jimfbleak and sign it with four tildes ~ when you post it. That will send me an alert. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:44, 3 November 2023 (UTC)