User talk:Spamcollector 13

A tag has been placed on APO Pro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mhking 22:03, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Delete
Do not remove speedy delete tags, if you wish you may place a hangon tag on the article. --Daniel J. Leivick

APO Pro
A tag has been placed on APO Pro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is a repost of either already posted material, or of material that was previously deleted in a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how APO Pro is different from all other articles, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:APO Pro saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we ask you to follow these instructions. Mhking 22:16, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

User:Mhking
Regarding your edits to User:Mhking:

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Happy Editing by  Snowolf (talk) on  22:41, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edits to User:Mhking:

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

Happy Editing by  Snowolf (talk) on  22:42, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

(added two different time because once reverted and then vandalized again) Happy Editing by  Snowolf (talk) on  22:43, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Still vandalizing! Happy Editing by  Snowolf (talk) on  22:47, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

User:Snowolf
Regarding your edits to User:Snowolf:

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Happy Editing by  Snowolf (talk) on  22:51, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Mhking 23:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)