User talk:Spanner2005

The company purchased was Mailbank.com Inc. as cited elsewhere in the article. The success, of relative lack thereof, of the migration, is a subjective statement which can't be determined from the link that you provided.
 * I'm very sorry, but you're wrong. The company WAS NetIdentity (formerly MailBank). Where is it cited that it is Mailbank? We could of course stop changing it back and forth and mention both companies.  As for the link... I haven't provided any link at all.  It was another user that has written that part of the article.  But the lack of success is not a subjective matter.  The migration has been a nightmare, and I can provide links that states this.  Even from Ross Rader, the person in charge of migration. See http://www.byte.org.  The section from Wednesday, September 27.  Here you will find links to ITWorld.com.
 * I'm very sorry again. I was wrong.  It is Mailbank.com - it seems it was known to customers as Mailbank then NeIdentity.  Sorry, I was arrogant.--Kaiolav72 14:38, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Tucows
I reverted your edits for Tucows, as I think the old section was right in that it was "NetIdentity". It seems to be the official name for the company. http://mailbank.com does forward to http://www.netidentity.com. So does http://www.nameplanet.com (another company, I guess buyed by NetIdentity). And the migration has been a scandal so far, so I think it should might as well be mentioned. If anything, the section is a little vague about that. --Kaiolav72 07:08, 17 October 2006 (UTC)