User talk:Sparkette

Archives: 1 · 2 · 3

Vandalism at Talk:Elf
Hard to interpret this as anything but vandalism. You can edit without any problems, so what happened there? Doug Weller (talk) 11:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Oh, I was just making a joke. I didn't think it was considered vandalism since it was just a talk page. Feel free to remove it. Sorry!  flarn 2006  [u t c] time: 04:30, 6 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I have. Seriously, talk pages are there just to discuss the article (not even the subject of the article, just the article itself). No harm done. Doug Weller (talk) 10:15, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Warning
This edit was not appropriate. Please restrict your use of talk pages to discussions aimed at improving article content. — swpb T 19:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Flarn2005-Photo.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flarn2005-Photo.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ RobTalk 23:13, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Wow, I forgot about that photo.  flarn 2006  [u t c] time: 03:15, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism at Talk:Elf redux, eg "IN SPITE OF THE MONSTER, AND THE COACH, ONLY TRASHY, I WILL BEAT DOWN THEM ALL"
I realise this is now a month and a half old, but reinstating your trolling and continuing to delete other editor's posts after my warning suggests to me that although I've reverted you again today we can expect you to do this again. And as it's not on my watchlist I didn't know anything about it until I was notified by another editor. Why in hell did you do this and why shouldn't I expect it to happen again? A short block now obviously won't prevent you from doing it again months from now, so the real issue is why let you continue to edit? Doug Weller talk 09:41, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I see the situation is worse than I thought, I'd missed the warning above for another talk page edit of yours. Doug Weller  talk 09:42, 11 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Okay, that's weird. I only remember adding that section once. And I remember being warned about it after that first time (which I thought was the only time) and I don't see why I would do it again. But it says I did, there's no denying that. I wish I could give you an explanation, but the fact is I have no memory of even doing it the second time, let alone why I did it. Sorry.


 * As for the removal of another person's message, that's not something I would have done intentionally, so that must have been a mistake. Maybe even a glitch, like I clicked "new section" but it submitted it as if I was editing an existing section, resulting in it being replaced. I don't know.


 * Really though, does it really matter if it's just a talk page? I mean yeah, removing another person's message is a problem, but again, that wasn't on purpose. But it's not like I was adding nonsense to an article. I was under the impression previously that you could say pretty much anything within reason on a talk page, as long as it had even a slight relevance to the topic. Even if it's just a joke. (That's relevant because of Pokémon Vietnamese Crystal, look it up.) I realized I was mistaken after you warned me the first time (was it you? I'm on mobile so it's hard to check while editing) but again, I have no clue why I did it again; as I said, I have no memory of doing it.


 * So yeah, sorry. All I can say is it won't happen a third time. That's for sure.  flarn 2006  [u t c] time: 11:23, 11 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Another inappropriate talk page edit would be the 4th time, as you've been warned about another one. No, relevance to the topic is not enough, it has to be about improving the article, see WP:Talk pages and WP:TALKNO. Ok, just make sure it doesn't happen again on any talk page. Doug Weller  talk 11:56, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Fus ro dah listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fus ro dah. Since you had some involvement with the Fus ro dah redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 01:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Portal:Software for deletion
A proposal has been made to delete Portal:Software, which you have made significant contributions to, as well as all other portals on English Wikipedia. You are welcome to contribute to the discussion if you'd like, which is located at Village pump (proposals). Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. North America1000 11:18, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Geometry
Portal:Geometry, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Geometry and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Geometry during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:54, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Software
Portal:Software, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Software and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Software during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Guilherme Burn (talk) 18:28, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:KTVU Asiana Airlines Prank.png
Thank you for uploading File:KTVU Asiana Airlines Prank.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aasim 19:16, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

"Beetle (video games)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Beetle (video games). The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 19 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC  678  19:07, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)