User talk:Sparklekitten

Joe Casey
Welcome to Wikipedia. You removed content from Wikipedia with this edit of yours to Joe Casey, but without providing a rationale for this in an Edit Summary. When removing material, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

I also reverted the photograph. While a photograph of the subject without dark sunglasses may generally be preferable, this new photo is of a low resolution that looks pixelated when displayed at the size you indicated in the article, and is badly cropped. If you disagree with this rationale, then let me know, and I'll start a consensus discussion on the article's talk page so that the community can decide which one to keep. Please do not revert the photo until such a discussion has reached a resolution.

If you have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks, and Happy Holidays. :-) Nightscream (talk) 05:26, 7 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Please do not remove sourced content from articles without a valid rationale, as you did a second time with this edit to Joe Casey. The material in question is relevant to the article and supported by a reliable source. If you insist that it is not appropriate for inclusion, then please begin a discussion on the article's talk pages, so we can discuss it, and if necessary, invite other members of the community to weigh in on the matter. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 14:46, 8 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Please stop removing valid, sourced content from the Joe Casey article, as you did with this edit, and please familiarize yourself more closely with Wikipedia's Neutrality policy. Neutrality refers to the requirement that material not convey the point of view of an editor, nor imply that Wikipedia sanctions a point of view derived from sources. The material you removed does not do this. The only opinion conveyed in that material are those given by Huddleston and Casey for the delay of Butcher Baker #7 in the two Comic Book Resources stories cited at the end of the passage, and CBR is indeed considered a reliable source for comics-related material. NPOV does not apply here. If you feel this is wrong, then please start a discussion on the article's talk page. If you continue to ignore these messages by removing material without discussion, then you risk being blocked from editing. Please do not make that necessary. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 11:56, 8 January 2013 (UTC)


 * This is your final warning. The next time you blank valid, sourced content from a Wikipedia article without discussion, and without providing a valid, policy-based rationale for it, as you did with this edit to Joe Casey, you will be blocked from editing. Nightscream (talk) 05:07, 10 January 2013 (UTC)