User talk:Sparklism/Archives/2015/May

The Eraser
After a flurry of nerdish activity this weekend, I've nominated The Eraser for GA. You know, if you fancied it... ;) Popcornduff (talk) 11:54, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah, never mind, another editor's jumped on it. That was fast! Popcornduff (talk) 17:56, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Ha ! I'll take a look at it anyway, see if I can help...that was fast - good luck! — sparklism hey! 08:11, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The GA review passed spotlessly. Obviously I'm pleased, but I'm a little suspicious - not even someone as talented (and handsome!) as myself does things right first time very often. So if you fancy casting a critical eye on it yourself, be my guest. Popcornduff (talk) 19:44, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, it is a pretty decent article, so I wouldn't worry too much. I see the reviewer is not massively experienced here, but not really complete a novice either. I'll take a deeper look when I get the chance. Cheers, and well done! — sparklism hey! 07:25, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much for your feedback on the article. I fixed the references and I'll look at your other points soon too. Popcornduff (talk) 23:01, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * That's very kind of you, thank you very much :) — sparklism hey! 07:22, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Sorry
I didn't know that I tryed to early. I'll wait! I'm not mad at all that you opposed. Jacob Lott 8 talk 07:22, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * That's OK. I guess somebody will close your RfA soon per WP:SNOW. The important thing is that you read WP:NOTNOW. Stick around and make a few thousand edits - if you still want to be an administrator by that point, you can try again then. Good luck! :) — sparklism hey! 07:28, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I apologise for being a bit curt, but I think you need to spend a bit more time indentifying what's vandalism and what is simply a good faith edit. In the case of Spyro (series), I considered this IP edit to be good faith as it gave a reason for removing the content in the edit summary. That means you shouldn't undo the edit giving no edit summary - even something like "restored reliably sourced content removed for no reason" would do. And if the IP reverts again (which they did), you stop and leave a note on the talk page. Anyway, no harm done here - keep up the article work and hope to see you at a better RfA in about 18 months' time. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  07:58, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Experimental Jet Set DYK nomination
Hi, I nominated Experimental Jet Set for DYK here. Feel free to leave comments. --Niwi3 (talk) 19:53, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ...and I see it succeeded at last. Well done ! :) — sparklism hey! 20:24, 30 May 2015 (UTC)