User talk:Sparklycryingbiscuit

Copyright violation, and IMDb
You described this edit of yours as "Added links".

You did not add links. Instead, you pasted in a passage from this page, linking to the page but not showing that what you added was verbatim. That's one kind of plagiarism.

When you edit Wikipedia, you are told "Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted." The content you added violated copyright and I have deleted it.

Additionally IMDb is not usable for referencing. -- Hoary (talk) 03:32, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Your first article, and IMDb
I see that you're working on the draft for an article. This is very brave of you; in principle, it's commendable. However, I suggest that you read and digest Help:Your first article and note what I've written above: IMDb is not usable for referencing. Please use other, reliable, independent, published sources. If there are none (if IMDb is all that exists), then an article will not be possible. -- Hoary (talk) 10:01, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: User:Sparklycryingbiscuit/sandbox has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Sparklycryingbiscuit/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:40, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: User:Sparklycryingbiscuit/sandbox has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Sparklycryingbiscuit/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:25, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sparklycryingbiscuit/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Sparklycryingbiscuit/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NightWolf1223 (talk) 16:34, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sparklycryingbiscuit/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Sparklycryingbiscuit/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Sparklycryingbiscuit (talk) 17:03, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Atharvnannu2, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that.    Zai  (💬 • 📝 • ⚡️) 16:03, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Atharvnannu2, you may be blocked from editing. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:09, 20 April 2021 (UTC)