User talk:Sparkyscience/Archives/2016/December

A Barnstar for you!

 * Thanks for this InsertCleverPhraseHere very unwarranted given the current turf battles going on by multiple editors (myself included) in the article! Will no doubt try to contribute something constructive again very soon - see you over there. --Sparkyscience (talk) 08:49, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you..

In particular, there is not yet WP:CONSENSUS for this addition to the article:. Regards, Rolf H Nelson (talk) 05:27, 20 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks Rolf. The irony is not lost on me that it appears to be you who is deleting other peoples contributions and that most other editors do not agree with your preferred version of the page. Any particular reason why you copy and pasted this warning on my and Musashi miyamoto but not InsertCleverPhrase talk page seeing as we have all done the same thing? I agree this needs to go to DR.--Sparkyscience (talk) 10:45, 21 December 2016 (UTC)