User talk:Sparkyscience/Archives/2017/October

Claus Montonen article
Hi, I was reading over your article on Montonen and wanted to express some concerns about the subject's notability. You have provided several sources, but it looks like these sources are either references to Montonen's own work, come from an obituary for someone else, or only mention Montonen in passing (i.e., are "trivial mentions"). This article needs references to sources that discuss Montonen specifically and in depth in order to verify his notability— that means references to works written by him won't count for this purpose, and brief mentions of his name here and there won't count either. It doesn't look like any of your references here are of this critically important type (maybe I am wrong?). I am not suggeting that he isn't notable, I am saying that his notability is difficult to assess based on what you have here for citations for it (which means the article is open to question as far as the subject's notability is concerned). That's all. Cheers! KDS4444 (talk) 12:07, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * He easily meets WP:PROF but this should be discussed in the article talk page not here. Weburbia (talk) 13:21, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Georges Lochak concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Georges Lochak, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 23 October 2017 (UTC)