User talk:Spartan-James

Re: Question
If the vandal has vandalized more than twice with no warnings, you can give him/her a level-three warning. By the way, please remove the Halo image in your talk page because it violates policy. All the best,  An as  talk? 15:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


 * For information on user pages and user talk pages, see WP:USER; it has all the information you need to know. As for fair use, see WP:NFC. — An as  talk? 16:01, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Would you like me to delete the image? — An as  talk? 16:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


 * You're free to put them wherever you want. You can put them on your user page, in a sub page of your user page, or just leave them on your talk page. — An as  talk? 01:09, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert
Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my userpage. I appreciate it. -- 健次 (derumi)talk 14:57, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

NVM
my mistake xD! i see what you did. get that guy ip block please :I

Drew McWeeny
Hi...um...I'm not vandalizing the Drew McWeeny article. Seriously, look at it. It's not written in an encyclopdic way at all right now, and it uses qualifying and biased language. Plus it includes both superfluous informatoin and a triva section, both of which are NOT supposed to be in wikipedia articles. And you're supposed to use a filmography to list his works. Can I make the necessary and appropriate changes or are you guys just going to revert it again? ScreenwriterJeb

About User:24.192.16.130
I am this user; I forgot to log in. If you notice, I was being constructive in that edit (a simple fact-check would indicate that when Silverman speaks of her boyfriend, she can only be talking about Jimmy Kimmel), and I would like you to consider that people making small anonymous edits may not be vandals. Check the diff properly next time. Thank you. Lockesdonkey 17:49, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

82.69.35.36
Can I ask why you edited my talk page edit on Helen Maria Bayly. I deleted out of date information which I had added myself (from a Talk page!) and added an opinion on the tag on the article wrt the biography project cleanup guidelines.

Daniel Radcliffe
Hah! You beat me to reverting that picture because I was laughing so hard I could get the cursor over the save page button :) Trusilver 02:46, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

PLEASE STOP
I have the right to vanish, I do not have the password to the account any longer, this is the third or fourth time someone has done this, please stop, it is my account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.104.37.17 (talk • contribs)
 * OK....but you might want to say that in the summary. Peace.  Sp art an- Ja mes  21:05, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

kthx...just frustrating because it hasn't lasted two minutes in the queue before being reverted!

Wakinglife24
Man, he's stirring up some real trouble now. Let's get him. Savie Kumara 23:30, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

I don't think we're finished with him yet. I think he's stirring up the same trouble on the same articles under the IP address 71.146.64.29. Savie Kumara 00:15, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

This IP address is stirring up some real trouble. I'm fighting him on the Megadeth article. Could you report him while I undo his vandalism? Savie Kumara 00:19, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Stacker article
Please can you give me a reason for reverting my edit which was not vandilism on this article.

Understanding anti-vandalism
Don't really understand why you reverted the Buy.com page. This time, I tried to explain in the discussion section why I changed those elements (and i sort of messed up that process). As a first time contributor trying to edit something I know about (have shopped there for years, bought stuff, returned stuff etc.), it weirds me out that an "anti-vandalism" user would undo factually correct improvements. Can't say the page is of excellent quality but at least it's an improvement on what was there. What guidelines do you follow to check information before undoing another user's edit?

Sorry, I forgot to sign this first time around. And I added citations to edits where possible and further explanation is discussion.

Emccsm 03:44, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

STEFY
Heya bud! I've noticed that the article has a lot of vandal edits from 70.119.x, probably a sockp. What's the best way to handle a situation like this? Alert an admin for a temp block for a range of IP's? - super &beta;&epsilon;&epsilon; cat 03:20, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

A request.
I recently checked your contribs. It says you've made 4807 edits! And you've made more than 180 reports to the AIV! It's incredible. I'd like to nominate you for adminship. It would truly be a great thing for Wikipedia if you were an amdmin. Would you like me to nominate you? Cheers, Je tL ov e r  (talk) 03:15, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I second this. :) —DerHexer (Talk) 16:04, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * WOW... O_O ...thanks! Peace.  Sp art an- Ja mes  16:39, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, just fill this out and it's a go. Cheers, Je tL ov e r  (talk) 21:16, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * There's been some calls to close your RfA, basically to avoid a huge number of opposes: after all, we're not here to hurt your feelings! Let me know - the choice is completely yours ~ Anthøny  21:17, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Anyone calling for any early close of this RfA other than the nominee needs to have their heads examined. Anyway, question for you on the RfA page.  &#10154; Hi DrNick ! 21:46, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I would NOT close it now, you're starting to get more support votes. You MIGHT just win this. Cheers, Je tL ov e r  (talk) 23:46, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Your RfA
Dear James, I've closed your RfA prematurely as, at 10 supports and double the number of opposes, it was unlikely to succeed. Please do not be discouraged - you've achieved a phenomenal amount in your time here, and I don't doubt that given a few more months of concerted activity, your next RfA will pass extremely well, and you can help out at AIV instead of backlogging it :) Please feel free to approach me should you require anything. Best regards, ~ Riana ⁂ 09:21, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Just thought I'd stop by to wish you good luck for next time. In general also a few months plus getting a couple of articles to GA or one to FA is very good preparation. Orderinchaos 10:00, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I am also here to say I'm sorry your RFA failed. Try again soon. Politics rule 17:36, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

User talk pages
Fyi: Editors can blank their pages or remove posts on their own pages whenever they want. That isn't vandalism. Please let me know if you have any questions. KillerChihuahua?!? 18:45, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Welcome back!
Welcome back to Wiki! You just beat my sorry butt on hazing! Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 03:03, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
I go AFK for one second and look what happens, lol. Anyway, thanks :) WDavis1911 03:15, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

hm.. a spartan interesting indeed
Hello my name is ANOMALY-117 and im under the impressiom that your name implies halo and your name is james or.. you play halo and have a thing for james bond. however it could just be the moive and your name or (obssesion (no offense). never the less an ally in the fight aginst vandilism is dualy needed. have you considerd putting a wikidef on you page? (see mine for more info.) another ally ANOMALY-117 04:26, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

never mindANOMALY-117 (talk) 21:12, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Rollback
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see New admin school/Rollback and Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks.  Jamie S93 ❤ 20:31, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Heh, yeah, it's a wonder. You're very welcome! Best,  Jamie S93 ❤ 20:35, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

HOW can you report me for vandalism???
Thanks for the warning, Spartan. Although, I feel it's rather unfair for the pictures I had put to be removed for no reason. I own the copyright to those pictures and had released them to public domain. I was accused of "spamming" the page, but I don't see what I was doing differently from what people do on other pages. For instance, the Starbucks page has about 20 pictures. So, if putting more pictures on this page is "spamming", then why are there so many pictures on Starbucks's page? I had in no way meant to vandalise the page. That was not the intention. I was just undoing the edits that were being done to the page because I felt they were unnecessary and not required. To block me from putting pictures and then calling it vandalism is rather unjust and undemocratic, and also very anti Wikipedia's concept. I would REALLY like you to look into this. Thanks. Gemmifer13 (talk) 19:50, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thank you! I had no idea we couldn't put that many pictures on a page. I now get it, and haven't tried to put any pictures up since then. And now that I've stopped THAT, someone got the five pictures that were on the page, removed. It's quite frustrating. I've also noticed that people replace perfectly written sentences by sentences that are grammatically incorrect, have wrong spelling etc. That's a bit annoying too. I'm still trying to figure how it all works. Thanks for your help :) Gemmifer13 (talk) 16:57, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)