User talk:Spartan21385

Alison Haislip
Hello. I see that you have reverted one of my edits on the aforementioned page. It was this one, which was when I made the Youtube Short HD Films section a subsection of the Video Blogging part. You gave your reasoning of reverting that in the edit summary of your edit, and I think that's a fair reason to have done that edit. Before I go on the page and do the revising I have in mind, I want your opinion on whether I should go forward with this idea or not. I was thinking that I'd make the "Video Blogging" and "Youtube Short HD Films" into subsections of a section that I would make specifically to house the text of the said sections. I will post a visual example of this thought below.

Video Blogging
Starting in September 2008, in correlation with launching her website, Haislip started releasing approximately 4-6 minute unedited video updates about once a week to stay more connected with her fans. Topics have ranged from answering fan questions posted on her forums to giving updates on her upcoming segments for Attack of the Show! before they air.

Occasionally Alison will have a guest alongside her while doing the blog. Past guests include fellow G4 personality Kevin Pereira, actress/dancer/writer Imogen Church, and Alison's younger brother, Greg.

During the spring of 2009, Alison started doing additional video blogs regarding her involvement with the Ford Fiesta Movement, a campaign in which she was one of 100 people to win one of the cars for 6 months, started by Ford Motor Company to help promote the model's upcoming US release.

YouTube Short HD Films
Beginning in June 2009, Alison has appeared in a number of short HD films, along with a troop of actors, on YouTube. The first film, titled "New Moongasm - A New Moon Parody" was uploaded on June 15, 2009. This was followed up by a film titled "Hi. I'm Joel Rush." on June 29, 2009.

So, what are your thoughts on this idea?

Backtable Speak to Me about what I have done  21:57, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello, I'm very new to working with wikipedia, so I'm not even entirely sure I'm responding to this correctly. Let me know if I'm not. As far as making it a subsection, I think your reasoning is certainly valid. That being said, I think Alison wants her short film work to be thought of in the context of a totally separate entity from her vlogging on youtube. In other words, the vlogs are an entity that is mutually exclusive to youtube, whereas the films are pieces that she worked on independently with her acting troupe, and simply used youtube as a means to show them to us. In that light perhaps titling the catagory "YouTube Short HD Films" is misleading. If they are to stay seperate perhaps the catagory could be changed to "Short HD Films" and a line of text could be added to the article as such: (I've bolded the area I changed just so you can see the difference.)

Short HD Films
Beginning in June 2009, Alison has appeared in a number of short HD films, along with a troupe of actors. They are currently available to be viewed on YouTube. The first film, titled "New Moongasm - A New Moon Parody" was uploaded on June 15, 2009. This was followed up by a film titled "Hi. I'm Joel Rush." on June 29, 2009.

Ok, thank you for checking with me first. Let me know your thoughts on this matter. (I also corrected my spelling error: acting troop should be acting troupe.) Thanks.

Spartan21385 (talk) 22:25, 9 July 2009 (UTC)


 * About whether you're responding correctly or not, it is an option whether to respond on your own talk page or to respond on the talk page of the user that send you the first comment (in this case, my talk page). The latter choice is my personal preference, since it is clearer to me when I have responses. Also, it isn't required, but it is recommended that responses that are separate from the other comments start with colons, depending on which number of comment it is. For instance, the first comment would have no colons. The second comment would have one. The third comment would have two, and so on and so forth.


 * As for your commentary on the idea I suggested, I can understand why that option is rejected. And your suggestion to add that bold sentence is a nice idea. Since you do want to keep the two sections separate, I am able to respect that wish of yours as well, so I won't do that heading thing. Also, thanks for correcting that misspelling, although I didn't know the difference to be honest (something that is probably rare to happen to me).


 * Backtable Speak to Me about what I have done  02:50, 10 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks man, I appreciate the help.
 * Spartan21385 (talk) 05:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:AlisonAtComicCon.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:AlisonAtComicCon.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:AlisonAtComicCon.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:AlisonAtComicCon.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jappalang (talk) 07:09, 29 March 2010 (UTC)