User talk:Spartay

Hi, could you explain why you are removing the links to archive.is? I don't see a conclusion to the latest RFC (Archive.is RFC 3) that would justify this? QuiteUnusual (talk) 12:43, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * These links are not dead. They do not need link to malicious archive. Spartay (talk) 12:49, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Specifically your apparent unapproved use of AWB Thank you. QuiteUnusual (talk) 12:46, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for a preventative measure until the issue of your apparently unapproved use of AWB is resolved.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite kite (talk) 12:50, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello. It would be useful if you could explain the (apparently) unapproved use of AWB here; you do not need to use an unblock template to do so. Black Kite kite (talk) 12:53, 1 July 2014 (UTC)