User talk:Spbacon

Welcome!
Hello, Spbacon, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 23:10, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Article Review
This article has a lot of great information about Campaign Zero. The fact that many of the policy solutions are already established but seem to be ignored by police is very disheartening. Listing each of the 10 policy solutions along with the components that would make the procedures success adds clarity. I would suggest adding information of the effectiveness (if there has been a decline in unarmed black deaths, or unarmed deaths in general) after the institution of Milwaukee police survey and/or the PRIDE ACt. Happy Editing! Naomiis (talk) 01:24, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Peer Review
I think you have done a fantastic job of covering your topic. The edits that you made to the "platform section" were very helpful as I know feel that I have a much better understanding of Campaign Zero. In order to further improve the article, I think you should expand on the Milwaukee policing survey as well as the PRIDE act; these two policies are mentioned in the beginning of the article but are not further elaborated on. Ultimately, this would give readers a better understanding of the concrete policies that are being implemented to further the campaign. Also, I think you could expand on the "reception" section of the article. I'm sure there are both individuals/interest groups that support the campaign as well as some that think the campaign might be frivolous; expanding on this section would increase the article's objectivity - not that it isn't already objective. In the end, I think you are doing a great job and it looks like this is going to be a really promising article! Newton3254 (talk) 15:17, 9 March 2017 (UTC)