User talk:Spdfile1

Disambiguation link notification for December 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited E&BV Subdivision, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Sandy Subdivision ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/E%26BV_Subdivision check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/E%26BV_Subdivision?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Style tips
A couple of things you might want to know, that I've been fixing: Happy New Year. Dicklyon (talk) 17:17, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * MOS:GEOCOMMA e.g. here.
 * MOS:DASH e.g. here.
 * MOS:CAPS e.g. here.

Nomination of CSX Southern Region for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CSX Southern Region is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/CSX Southern Region until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:24, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of CSX Northern Region for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CSX Northern Region is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/CSX Northern Region until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:26, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Charlotte Subdivision for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charlotte Subdivision is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Charlotte Subdivision until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. NotOrrio (talk) 05:52, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Changing Focus on LH&StL Subdivision page
I was going to start a page on the Louisville, Henderson & Saint Louis Railroad when I came across the page you started at LH&StL Subdivision. Do you think it would be better to morph the current page into a history of the old independent railroad (and rename the page) or start a new page? Gooseneck41 (talk) 21:57, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of KD Subdivision for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KD Subdivision is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/KD Subdivision until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Boleyn (talk) 07:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC)