User talk:SpecialConversations

Speedy deletion of Cuteness wormholes
A tag has been placed on Cuteness wormholes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Woland (talk) 17:28, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Special Conversations of the Einstein Mind, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. De728631 (talk) 17:28, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

August 2008
Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. If you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. De728631 (talk) 17:35, 16 August 2008 (UTC) Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. It Is Me Here (talk) 15:40, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Teabagging in Video Games"
A page you created, Teabagging in Video Games, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you.  Josh3580 HG / AWBuser / talk / hist 21:31, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

{unblock|I feel i made a valid contribution to wikipedia, i do not understand why my article is considered vandalism; teabagging in modern video games in a prominent feature. We shouldn't shy away from the issue.

If the article were in inappropriate, it certainly was not constructed with inappropriate intentions, and a year long ban most definately is unjustified.}}
 * You don't have the ability to unblock yourself, but if you keep putting fake unblock acceptances on your talk page, I have the ability to prevent you from editing your talk page. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:50, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I see you restored the fake unblock acceptance; your request for the protection of this page has been granted. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:54, 27 August 2008 (UTC)