User talk:Spectrecom

Please note that Wikipedia does not accept advertisements or copyright material - the content of the page was identical to the company website.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article's talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at the talk page with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article talk page.
 * Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at the article talk page with a link to the web page details.
 * Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. Jimfbleak 15:14, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi, Ben. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~

Note that even if the copyright issue is sorted, the article needs more work to survive. It needs to provide independent verifiable sources that it meets the notability guidelines. Obviously your own website is not independent. It is also written in too promotional a style, with many unsourced advert-like claims eg a strong creative team with broad industry experience - at the forefront of corporate communications, developing highly effective communication solutions for a diverse range of satisfied corporate clients - Their experienced team  - is a critically acclaimed and award-winning film and television production company - The first two priorities are now being successfully delivered, and for 2007 Spectrecom is now actively developing its own television ideas -  popular and busy film and television studio etc. Articles must be neutral in tone. Also only bold Spectrecom once. Bolding every time is very spammy

Hope this helps to avoid further speedy deletion, Jimfbleak 18:11, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on User:Spectrecom, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Calton | Talk 00:35, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

September 2007
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. Mr.  Z- man  04:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC)