User talk:Speedrailsm

Welcome!
Hello, Speedrailsm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 220  of  Borg 03:38, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

December 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to GetUp!, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:52, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Islam in Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Islam in Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trepang. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Yassmin Abdel-Magied Lede
Hi Speedrailsm, I noticed that you edited the opening sentence for Yassmin Abdel-Magied back after I removed your previous edit. I've opened a discussion on Talk:Yassmin Abdel-Magied which you are free to join so we can get the lede sorted! Thanks, Boopitydoopityboop (talk) 23:44, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Nick-D (talk) 22:56, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

From your editing pattern it is obvious that you are the latest incarnation of the editor I blocked in 2015 for BLP violations as. Other accounts you have operated are,. A key common thread linking these accounts is high volume additions of material almost always presenting a negative portrayal of Australian Muslims. Another key thread is the consistent violations of WP:BLP which are driven by this agenda. This has continued into this account, and appears to have escalated in both frequency and seriousness over recent months. I note in particular the following edits:
 * Clearly over the top editing relating to Yassmin Abdel-Magied, including:
 * Trying to add a single remark she made on a TV show to the high-level feminism in Australia article with conservative politician and ex-Prime Minister Tony Abbott's views on this as well as Abbott's article
 * And then adding similar material to the feminism in Australia article several weeks after it was removed despite another editor having stated that it's inappropriate for a 'big picture' article
 * Engaged in WP:OR and personal attacks concerning her remark, labelling it "dubious" in both a hidden note in the article and on the article's talk page (where you also claimed she had made a "dubious translation") . On this basis of this OR you then added a link to what you believed she was talking about to the article
 * Added news stories about Senator Jacqui Lambie, who is well known for being critical of Islam, to the article on Abdel-Magied despite them not actually being used to reference any material on the grounds (given in the edit summary) that "Her [Jacqui Lambie's] pejorative statement (now deleted) does provide a significant insight into the thinking of Abdel-Magied"
 * Adding negative BLP referenced to an op-ed with the edit summary This wiki page currently does not reflect the considerable community concern about Abdel-Magied's activities. The page is structured well, beyond the BLP "regard for the subject's privacy"
 * Given the context, I suspect that you were also the person adding extreme negative BLP to this article and my talk page concerning this person (including copying and pasting abusive Facebook posts) as - I note in particular this post where the account claimed I had previously been involved with their edits.
 * Repeated negative BLP material claiming that various views of and comments of Keysar Trad are "controversial":
 * A claim that Keysar Trad's remarks on the Association of Islamic Charitable Projects were somehow controversial - the source did not state that these remarks were controversial in any way, and actually described Mr Trad's remarks as being part of the condemnation by "mainstream Islamic groups" of a decision by a regulatory agency to allow this group's radio station to remain on the air
 * A statement that Mr Trad's desire to have a second wife is 'controversial' . The source does include someone criticising him for wanting to do so, but this hardly seems a noteworthy controversy.
 * Addition of negative material concerning a living person referenced to what's clearly marked as an opinion article
 * Addition of negative BLP material cited to a self-published source

As noted above, I have been involved with addressing problems with your edits under this and the probable previous accounts. As such, this block is made under the provision for "involved" admins to respond to BLP issues as specified at WP:BLPREMOVE Nick-D (talk) 22:57, 29 April 2017 (UTC)