User talk:Spellcast

__NOINDEX__

Your GA nomination of Battle of Kowloon
The article Battle of Kowloon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Kowloon for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indy beetle -- Indy beetle (talk) 17:02, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Nicholas Tomlinson
Many thanks for tracking down the Litho of Nicholas Ralph Tomlinson, it looks great. I knew it was out there but could could not find it on Wikicommons. So some great tidying from you very much appreciated.Sakralamn (talk) 12:43, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * No worries! Spellcast (talk) 17:13, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Opium Wars
Template:Campaignbox Opium Wars has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:41, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Lord Palmerston's letters
I remember your comment on the Talk:First Opium War page about Lord Palmerston's letters to the Chinese Emperor and the Elliots. Are these [] [] the correct ones? Also, I have broken down and purchased a physical book concerning the First Opium War, and hope that I can begin major improvements on the information flow in the article. Cheers. SamHolt6 (talk) 15:05, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Been so busy lately, but yes those should be it. And great work with the article. It's good to see this topic get some much needed improvement. Keep it up! Spellcast (talk) 12:39, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

United Kingdom
It's been bugging me for ages that Wikipedia implied that it was a former country! DuncanHill (talk) 13:56, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Haha I know right! It's so easy to think that with the way the article is presented, that's why it needs to be stated directly. Spellcast (talk) 14:08, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi Spellcast
Hello Spellcast, how can one reach you? I have valuable information regarding a particular article you edit which I believe should be on wiki. Thank you Office786313 (talk) 11:50, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Simply the article's talk page or email. Spellcast (talk) 12:19, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Sorry I cannot access your Email. Can you please write it for me? Thank you. Office786313 (talk) 19:40, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
 * spellcast.wiki@gmail.com. Spellcast (talk) 21:55, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

RM close on Asgardia (nation)
I think you may have accidentally miscounted here, including me there were six editors favoring Asgardia (micronation), and only three favoring Asgardia. The subject hardly came up, but my second choice would have been Space Kingdom of Asgardia.--Pharos (talk) 23:13, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * There's clear agreement to remove (nation) as incorrect. But I didn't think it would be an issue at all (even amongst most of those six editors) to move it to "Asgardia" as there's no other article with that title, of which this is clearly the primary topic. There' only one or two other topics this may get confused with, in which case a hatnote seems more appropriate than a dab page. Do you still support a DAB page? I'll be happy to either revert myself and let the discussion run longer or put it up to move review. Spellcast (talk) 00:12, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Author & Dating Coach Alan Roger Currie
Spellcast, I read your comment suggesting that no Wiki bios should begin with phrases such as "an award-winning [insert career title here]", but before initially doing so with Alan Roger Currie's page, I researched a few pages to see if that was appropriate. A few:

Leon Hale

Helen Brown (author)

Dee Henderson

Rami M. Shapiro

Jake Edwards (radio personality)

Jeff Henderson (chef)

So my question becomes, if these biographical Wiki pages above begin with "an award-winning [insert career title here]", why can't Alan Roger Currie's page begin in the same manner? Thank you Chicago Smooth (talk) 04:22, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Image should be deleted?
Hi Spellcast. I see that you deleted. Elsewhere there is that says its source is "en:Image:Day239picklebarrelc.JPG", i.e., the source is the deleted image. So should this derived image not be deleted too for the same reason? My personal issue with it as that it does not offer any useful information in terms of identifying it as being part of this or that cuisine. Rui &#39;&#39;Gabriel&#39;&#39; Correia (talk) 13:18, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, the pic is on Commons so it can't be deleted here. You can always remove or replace it with a better one if you think it's not useful. Spellcast (talk) 10:32, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Spellcast. Regards, Rui &#39;&#39;Gabriel&#39;&#39; Correia (talk) 22:17, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Resources of Richard Simkin's artwork

 * Long time no see. I hadn't uploaded files on wikimedia commons for many years. Many sites was shut down and I can't find the previous resources before 2012. Did you know whre to find this image? The author is Richard Simkin, but it needs higher resolution.--俠刀行 (talk) 21:26, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello again! I can't find a bigger image. You can upload the small one if you want. If we find a bigger one later, we can always upload it over the smaller one. Spellcast (talk) 10:35, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay ✅. If you have an image without watermark. Feel free to upload one.--俠刀行 (talk) 17:33, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Gaytv is not a company name that I am aware of. I have no connection to a company named gaytv. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccchambers (talk • contribs) 20:31, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular
   

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 03:01, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Original source of the Chinese officer tears down the British flag on the arrow

 * Here, the image comes from the book naming Cassell's Illustrated History of England, publishing in 1896. I tried to search the book to find the image. But I can't find that due to my English skill. The page description is wrote like the affair of the arrow.
 * Could you find a clear resolution now? We have known the illustrator, the original year may be in 1896. One step will be done. --俠刀行 (talk) 04:44, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I can't find a link to the original book. But that's OK. The title is good enough. Spellcast (talk) 12:11, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Author & Professional Dating Coach Alan Roger Currie
I have a request for help from you: Can you kindly provide me with some support for the Alan Roger Currie article that I created in April 2015?? I would VERY MUCH appreciate your support and assistance. Thank you. The Discussion is HERE Chicago Smooth (talk) 16:41, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Infinite IP blocks?
Hi. Noticed that you have some old infinite IP blocks. Do you think that they are still relevant and current? — billinghurst  sDrewth  02:01, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Yep. I just checked and they're all still valid. All 24 blocks are still either webhosts or anonymisers. Half of them are even blocked globally. Spellcast (talk) 04:11, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Maybe I poorly worded my approach. Do we still need these blocks to be infinite blocks all these years later, rather than long-term definite blocks, especially if there are global blocks that cover the IP ranges. Thanks for the answer and thanks for looking. — billinghurst  sDrewth  04:28, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * For indefinite rangeblocks of open proxies, periodically reviewing them, say, once every year or few years is just as acceptable of an approach as blocking them long-term. 5-year blocks may sound long but they're not compared to the lifespan of these webhosts. Spellcast (talk) 04:46, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Sure sure. Just want us to ensure that it is eyes wide open stuff. Many tools have changed since the mid noughties. — billinghurst  sDrewth  08:22, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Victor Chang.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Victor Chang.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed&#32;if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. —&thinsp;JJMC89 bot 00:04, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users
Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Kyle Mcmahon
Greetings, Just getting this info regarding the subject page Kyle Mcmahon, as I was offline for a bit due to a death in the family. Am seeing I was told to contact you regarding undeleting this piece. Subject meets two notability requirements both in television and in radio / podcasts, being in most major markets for I Heart Radio and the podcast having long form interviews with guests that all meet our notability requirements. The other notability would fall under television where subject was the focus of a series of episodes with Oprah, one of which won an Emmy.

This page was created in conjunction with numerous editors and admins from The Teahouse and then went on to be edited and added to by numerous users, editors and admins.

Your work is appreciated

FRANKY (talk) 20:04, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed&#32;if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. —&thinsp;JJMC89 bot 18:14, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jam Master Jay.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jam Master Jay.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder
This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.Thank you for your past contributions to the project. —&thinsp;JJMC89 bot 00:24, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Talk:Lynn Hoffman (author) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Talk:Lynn Hoffman (author) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talk:Lynn Hoffman (author) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Boleyn (talk) 15:46, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Allhiphop screenshot.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Allhiphop screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SOHH.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SOHH.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 23 February 2024 (UTC)