User talk:SpencerGormley

Venetia Dearden
Hello. You requested the Venetia Dearden article be deleted because "I'm Venetia's assistant we talked last Friday and she would like this deleted on the basis that it hasn't be referenced properly, i will be saving all the info on this page in case circumstances change". An article that clearly demonstrates notability is not going to be deleted, it is instead going to be improved upon, in this case in the first instance by finding reliable references. You engaged the wrong process. I have now added a few references, which took just a couple of minutes, and I may add more. Also, I am sure you are aware, but in case not then please take note of Wikipedia's policy on conflict of interested editors. Thank you. -Lopifalko (talk) 13:26, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I have spent 30 mins working on the article. I have added a number of sources and removed all bar one small remaining unsourced claim. In my opinion it now hangs together well, demonstrating Dearden's notability, albeit lacking in depth. It may well lack important aspects of her career but everything at least is sourced. If you wish to comment further such as to suggest alterations or additions then please do so at Talk:Venetia Dearden. Thank you. -Lopifalko (talk) 13:55, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello I will talk with Ventia on Monday to see where we go next

Thanks