User talk:Spencertaylor

September 2010
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Spod. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 12:02, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Spod
The issue of verifiability aside, it's clear from the first edit where you tried to use Wikipedia as a soapbox that the reason you're so attached to pushing this content into WP is because you have convinced yourself that you and your friends invented the word "spod" -- rather ridiculously, since it was around for years before you started using it to mock your clients. Your subsequent tweaks to your attempted use of Wikipedia for self-publishing, trying to somehow make the prior origination of the term compatible with your story, are not impressive. If I were you, I would not expect to see your efforts humored in any way. &mdash;chaos5023 (talk) 16:35, 17 September 2010 (UTC)