User talk:Speshk

Portledge School
Your user edits show that you have only ever worked on the Portledge School Wikipedia page. While there is nothing wrong with this specifically, it leads me to believe that you have some agenda here. While your interests in maintaining the Portledge page may be perceived as beneficial to the Wikipedia community, the reality of the fact is you are pushing a pro-Portledge view. Individual school pages are a subject of contention amoungst Wikipedia users; people tend to become passionate about their school or even their school's rivals. While this may seem to be confrontational, I am purely trying to maintain the objectivity that is essential to an Encyclopedia. If you would refrain from removing "criticisms" such as claimed isolated instances of drug use, and instead bring up the subject on the page's discussion page, a dispute could be resolved more democratically.

All I am asking is that you think more as an observer than someone related to the school; if there is drug use, for instance, than it should be included on the Wikipedia page. Wikipedia is not Craig's list, it is a public reference, and somebody concerned with a topic's image cannot contribute objectively.

RideABicycle 04:02, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Redent Portledge Edits
I wish to make it known that I had nothing to do with the latest set of reverts on Portledge School. A user saw fit to re-instate deleted information, clearly an action with positive intent. RideABicycle 01:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC)