User talk:Spewmaster

 R o  gerthat  Talk  00:54, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi Spewmaster, thanks for your hard work in tidying up international Aussie Rules articles! --AaronRichard 00:11, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Images
You say they are in the public domain, but there's no evidence for that. All I could see is that they were copied from websites which had a clear copyright mark at the bottom. An image is only in the public domain when the photographer specifically releases it into the public domain. - Mgm|(talk) 05:48, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh wait. I remember deleting a whole string of rugby images last year as they were taken from various websites. If you indeed took these yourself, I may have made a mistake on those and if I did I apologize for that. I'll check to see what happened. - Mgm|(talk) 09:13, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Tony Lockett Golden Goals.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tony Lockett Golden Goals.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. JPD (talk) 13:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Tony Lockett Golden Goals.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Tony Lockett Golden Goals.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

International section of Australian rules football
Hi Spewmaster. The Australian rules football article is meant to be a summary article, and your recent additions to the Australian rules football internationally section have made it disproportionately long. Do you think you could summarise the section, and incorporate the longer version into the main article Australian rules football around the world? Thanks, JPD (talk) 11:30, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:2002_international_cup_logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:2002_international_cup_logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:43, 18 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 17:43, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Aussie rules at Sydney University
What makes you think Sydney University Students AFC is a spin off from the rugby club? I'm not saying it isn't, but I'd like to see a reference/source. Grant |  Talk  03:44, 27 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The club's website and Full Points Footy show that it was formed in 1863 with the rugby club and has a continuous history. In the early days, they shared players.  But they are now separate distinct clubs.  --Spewmaster 01:05, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:PA005635.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:PA005635.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:55, 11 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 03:55, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Rugby League World Golden Boot Award
I'm removing the merger tag. This award is nothing to do with the RLIF, it is awarded by Rugby League World magazine and predates the RLIF Awards. The confusion arises because it is presented during the RLIF Awards night but it is neither awarded by the RLIF or on behalf of the RLIF.GordyB (talk) 12:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:International rules 2006.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:International rules 2006.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Australian rules football in South Africa
Hi why do you want it translated into Afrikaans? Where are you going to post it? I can get it done by a friend if it's worth while. Ozdaren (talk) 12:43, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * OK no answer, mustn't be important. Ozdaren (talk) 08:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 2007 International Rules Series
I have nominated 2007 International Rules Series, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/2007 International Rules Series. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:38, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Kit body aflshoulders.png
The above-named image or media file that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 09:43, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Image listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kit left arm afl2.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 09:09, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Add Image:Kit right arm afl2.png

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Spewmaster! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is an  Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current  article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 15:44, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Milham Hanna -


 * Similarly, although I am not a bot, I'd like to point out that Ryan O'Connor is also an unreferenced biography and needs to be addressed. TheFeds 20:56, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of List of off-field incidents involving rugby league players for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of off-field incidents involving rugby league players is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of off-field incidents involving rugby league players until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. StAnselm (talk) 23:28, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Meetup invitation: Melbourne 26
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 06:56, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Bump animated.gif or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:29, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Men for All Seasons


The article Men for All Seasons has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Tagged for notability since 2012, unconvinced it meets the general notability guideline."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jenks24 (talk) 10:46, 20 November 2017 (UTC)